Author: Steven Chaba <Steven_Chaba AT RGE DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:29:46 -0500
Getting ready to upgrade to a fairly current version of TSM (from ADSM 3.1.1.5!). Not being fond of being "bleeding edge", what would be the group's feeling as to what the most current version is tha
Author: "Pearson, Dave" <DCPearson AT SNOPUD DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:03:10 -0800
We have AIX 4.3.2 - We are using TSM 4.1.0 and having minimal problem with it. We did upgrade to TSM 4.1.2 and we had problem with our Archive jobs. One archive job we did usually ran for 2 hours. Wh
Author: Tab Trepagnier <Tab.Trepagnier AT LAITRAM DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:29:33 -0600
David, You stated: "One archive job we did usually ran for 2 hours. When we went to 4.1.2 it took over 15 hours... Not acceptable of course! So we went back to 4.1.0 and the archive ran okay. IBM Sup
Author: Kathleen M Hallahan <Kathleen_Hallahan AT FREDDIEMAC DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:35:17 -0500
Has anyone noticed anything like this happening with regular backups? We recently upgraded our server code to 4.1.2, and while the vast majority of our backups are running faster, there are a couple
Author: Rich Taft <Rich.Taft AT RICOH-USA DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:04:10 -0500
Actually I am having an ongoing problem with Version 4.1.3 running on AIX 4.3.3. Seems that whenever one of my DLT tape drives wants to be cleaned the Tivoli Server Crashes. It doesn't happen every t
Rich, It appears that we may have a similar setup, and we are about to migrate to TSM 4.1 from ADSM 3.1. Are there any tips/minutia to be aware of for the change? Did you do a server upgrade as well,
Author: "Walker, Thomas" <Thomas.Walker AT EMICAP DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:50:23 -0500
I spoke with Tivoli yesterday. They recommend going to 4.1.3 Has anyone done that? Have the archives become more reasonable? Ours were taking nearly 3 DAYS to complete!! Once again I'm stuck on the b
Author: "Pearson, Dave" <DCPearson AT SNOPUD DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2001 07:55:13 -0800
They don't have a fix for the problem with the archives problem yet. So we are staying on 4.1.0. I will be upgrading to 4.1.2 on our test server for TSM to test it out and send some info to Tivoli Su
Author: "Walker, Thomas" <Thomas.Walker AT EMICAP DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:18:16 -0500
Tivoli claims that with v4.1.2 they've tried a new archiving sceme. If you'd like to use the old scheme, you must specify -v2archive when running the client (dsmc -v2archive for AIX for example). The
Author: Tab Trepagnier <Tab.Trepagnier AT LAITRAM DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:42:12 -0600
Thomas, "Tivoli claims that with v4.1.2 they've TRIED a new archiving sceme." Great. I can tell you from my experience with 4.1.2 that it doesn't work. The client that's giving the most trouble is an
Author: "Gill, Geoffrey L." <GEOFFREY.L.GILL AT SAIC DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2001 22:11:11 -0800
What ever happened to doing your testing on your own time and effort. When you have the product working, stable....and better, you deliver it to the customer. Not, deliver and wait to see who scream