Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+vs\.\s+firewall\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+vs\.\s+firewall\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: "Yves.Morin" <Yves.Morin AT STANDARDLIFE DOT CA>; Date: Tue, 2 Jun 1998 12:31:38 -0400; This is a multi-part message in MIME format.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-06/msg00051.html (9,851 bytes)
2. ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: "Knapton, David" <david.knapton AT TRAVELERS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 14:27:19 -0400; Can ADSM backup a client on the other side of a firewall? Has anyone done this? If so, would you care to share your experiences? Dave Knapton Travelers Property Casualty; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00914.html (11,038 bytes)
3. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: "Moir,Betsy" <betsy.moir AT ABBOTT DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 14:03:12 -0500; I'm not a communications person, but it can be done. We have a firewall and we have several people who back up from home. They connect to our network using AVOC or PC3270 and then ADSM works exactly; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00915.html (11,566 bytes)
4. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Craig Treptow <CATreptow AT EQUITABLE-OF-IOWA DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 14:11:44 -0500; I'm not a firewall person either, but my guess is that you'll just have to enable TCP/IP on port 1500 (or whatever port you're using) in your firewall, so that that traffic can get through. It should; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00916.html (12,173 bytes)
5. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Steffan Rhoads <arhoads AT PACBELL DOT NET>; Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 13:00:29 -0700; This is a multi-part message in MIME format.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00923.html (11,024 bytes)
6. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Doug Thorneycroft <dthorneycroft AT LACSD DOT ORG>; Date: Thu, 28 May 1998 14:06:45 -0700; Check out the archives, I think that there are a few solutions listed there.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00930.html (11,330 bytes)
7. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Robert Tetstall <bob_tetstall.Contr AT BE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 19:06:59 +0000; Status Distribution May 28, 1998 19:03:20 The message regarding "Re: ADSM vs. firewall" sent on May 28, 1998 19:03:20 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Fore; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00955.html (11,956 bytes)
8. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Robert Tetstall <bob_tetstall.Contr AT BE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 19:22:04 +0000; Status Distribution May 28, 1998 19:12:33 The message regarding "Re: ADSM vs. firewall" sent on May 28, 1998 19:12:33 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Fore; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00957.html (11,970 bytes)
9. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Robert Tetstall <bob_tetstall.Contr AT BE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 20:07:33 +0000; Status Distribution May 28, 1998 19:59:40 The message regarding "Re: ADSM vs. firewall" sent on May 28, 1998 19:59:40 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Fore; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00962.html (11,970 bytes)
10. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Hans Van Mingroot <vanmingroot AT BE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 20:07:35 +0000; Status Distribution May 28, 1998 19:59:40 The message regarding "Re: ADSM vs. firewall" sent on May 28, 1998 19:59:40 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Fore; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00963.html (11,923 bytes)
11. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Hans Van Mingroot <vanmingroot AT BE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 21:35:23 +0000; Status Distribution May 28, 1998 21:18:34 The message regarding "Re: ADSM vs. firewall" sent on May 28, 1998 21:18:34 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Fore; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00970.html (11,931 bytes)
12. ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Robert Tetstall <bob_tetstall.Contr AT BE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 23:04:58 +0000; Status Distribution May 28, 1998 19:02:24 The message regarding "ADSM vs. firewall" sent on May 28, 1998 19:02:24 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Foreign; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00974.html (11,936 bytes)
13. Re: ADSM vs. firewall (score: 1): Author: Robert Tetstall <bob_tetstall.Contr AT BE.IBM DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 29 May 1998 23:05:28 +0000; Status Distribution May 28, 1998 21:18:31 The message regarding "Re: ADSM vs. firewall" sent on May 28, 1998 21:18:31 was sent by Status Recipient Type To Native Name ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU Fore; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1998-05/msg00975.html (11,895 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 13
Page: [1]