Author: "David Browne." <dbrowne AT HUMANA DOT COM>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 13:57:01 -0400
I have a question on MOUNTRETENTION. We have Tivoli Storage Manager V3.7.1.0 running on OS390/2.8 (mainframe). We currently have MOUNTRETENTION set to 5 (five). Is there benefits or problems decreasi
Author: Gary Ison <Gary.Ison AT MAIL.STATE.KY DOT US>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 14:01:40 -0400
David, The immediate benefit is, obviously, that you have a drive freed up sooner for other users. I haven't seen a downside in over 5 years of running with the time set to 1 minute. One thing would
Author: David Browne. [SMTP:dbrowne AT HUMANA DOT COM]
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:30:26 -0500
I have a question on MOUNTRETENTION. We have Tivoli Storage Manager V3.7.1.0 running on OS390/2.8 (mainframe). We currently have MOUNTRETENTION set to 5 (five). Is there benefits or problems decreasi
The MOUNTRetention value is a balancing act, depending upon the current needs. Here are my notes on it... MOUNTRetention Operand of 'DEFine DEVclass' and 'UPDate DEVclass' commands, to specify how lo
Author: Shelby Beach <Shelby.Beach AT TEALE.CA DOT GOV>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2000 11:12:19 -0700
David, We used to have MOUNTRETENTION set to 0, but that sometimes caused problems. In particular, during most of the day, the high migration threshold on our disk storage pool is set to 0% (because