Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+and\s+Security\s+\-\-\s+looks\s+pretty\s+easy\s+to\s+get\s+files\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+and\s+Security\s+\-\-\s+looks\s+pretty\s+easy\s+to\s+get\s+files\s*$/: 11 ]

Total 11 documents matching your query.

1. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: Debbie Cavallucci <debcav5 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 14:07:27 EDT; Well, I guess that answers my question. There is no real security with ADSM. Earlier postings state that it's security is "Kerberos-like" - that doesn't seem true either. Doesn't this seem to bother; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00255.html (12,060 bytes)
2. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: "Cao, Chan" <ccao AT BROOKS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 14:27:07 -0400; I looked but didn't see much discussion on this? Clients need to enter the correct password and there's a variable to lock out if incorrect passwords are entered so many times. What level of security; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00256.html (11,981 bytes)
3. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: Debbie Cavallucci [mailto:debcav5 AT HOTMAIL DOT COM]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:31:35 -0500; Well, I guess that answers my question. There is no real security with ADSM. Earlier postings state that it's security is "Kerberos-like" - that doesn't seem true either. Doesn't this seem to bother; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00257.html (12,114 bytes)
4. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: Kyle Payne <payne AT BERBEE DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 13:35:01 -0500; I didn't see what was posted to lead you down this path. Did anyone mention that with some competitors products you can simply grab a tape with data on it and read the data. With ADSM unless you have; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00258.html (12,607 bytes)
5. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:31:35 -0500; Well, I guess that answers my question. There is no real security with ADSM. Earlier postings state that it's security is "Kerberos-like" - that doesn't seem true either. Doesn't this seem to bother; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00259.html (12,230 bytes)
6. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims <rbs AT BU DOT EDU>; Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 14:44:58 -0400; There hasn't been as much discussion of *SM security as in other areas where we are trying to keep our heads above water, but that is not to say that security is not an important issue. ADSM's secur; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00260.html (12,286 bytes)
7. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: "Cook, Dwight E" <cookde AT BP DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 13:45:25 -0500; remember in a unix environment, only root may restore any file... if an individual user fires up dsmc, they may only restore files they have read privs on and if they don't have write privs they have; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00261.html (14,863 bytes)
8. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: "Cao, Chan" <ccao AT BROOKS DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 14:50:49 -0400; In general, security is not something many packages give attention to. I'm using one right now that requires .rhosts uggh. It's an important issue of course. Another package I used that I came to hat; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00262.html (11,898 bytes)
9. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: Richard Sims [mailto:rbs AT BU DOT EDU]; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:31:35 -0500; There hasn't been as much discussion of *SM security as in other areas where we are trying to keep our heads above water, but that is not to say that security is not an important issue. ADSM's secur; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00263.html (12,451 bytes)
10. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: Kelly Lipp <lipp AT STORSOL DOT COM>; Date: Thu, 6 Apr 2000 13:45:17 -0600; What particular business problem are you trying address with *SM security? There is security within the product. The question is is the security provided ample to deal with a particular business prob; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00265.html (12,147 bytes)
11. Re: ADSM and Security -- looks pretty easy to get files (score: 1): Author: ADSM: Dist Stor Manager [mailto:ADSM-L AT VM.MARIST DOT EDU]On Behalf Of; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:31:35 -0500; remember in a unix environment, only root may restore any file... if an individual user fires up dsmc, they may only restore files they have read privs on and if they don't have write privs they have; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-04/msg00266.html (14,959 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 11
Page: [1]