Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+and\s+3490E\s+D42\s+Tape\s+Drive\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: "Peter Hadikin (HDIP9235)" <HDIP9235 AT BCITVM.BCIT.BC DOT CA>
Date: Wed, 7 Dec 1994 13:51:33 PST
We have an ADSM server running under VM. I am finding that when migrating to tape cartridge we are only writing about 400 meg of data per cartridge before the tape fills up. The tape drives we have a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00041.html (11,806 bytes)

2. Re: ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Sanders, VM System Maintenance" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 1994 11:22:28 CST
Is data compression being done by the client workstations? If so, then I think that you should expect to see little or no additional compression from IDRC. On our 3490 drives with standard 3480 cartr
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00051.html (11,841 bytes)

3. Re: ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: "Keith A. Crabb" <KEITH AT UHUPVM1.UH DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 1994 11:50:19 CST
I have Memorex equivalents of 3490E tape drives and am using the 3490 extended length cartridges with data compression on the clients and am seeing about 800M per cartridge. So I'd say 400M is about
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00052.html (12,638 bytes)

4. Re: ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: "Larry Sanders, VM System Maintenance" <[email protected]>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 1994 15:10:26 CST
It's true that if you turn off data compression on the clients, the ADSM server will report that it is putting more data on each cartridge, but that is because the server would be writing uncompresse
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00053.html (12,106 bytes)

5. Re: ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: Paul Zarnowski <VKM AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 1994 18:00:14 EST
Aside from being more "network-friendly", having the client do the data compression will cost you less in ADSM storage license fees.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00054.html (11,703 bytes)

6. Re: ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: "Keith A. Crabb" <KEITH AT UHUPVM1.UH DOT EDU>
Date: Thu, 8 Dec 1994 17:55:37 CST
Oh, I thought that hardware compression was still generally from 5-20% better than software compression, depending on the scheme used. We had figured who cares if we have to buy 20% more cartridges t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00055.html (12,896 bytes)

7. Re: ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: Nick Laflamme <NLAFLAMM AT VMA.CC.ND DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 1994 08:51:28 EST
For those of us who worry more about technical issues than licensing issues, can someone review the concept of "ADSM storage license fees"? I remember that the ADSM license feature codes indicate how
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00056.html (11,508 bytes)

8. Re: ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: Leonard Boyle <SNOLEN AT VM.SAS DOT COM>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 1994 12:29:50 EST
Nick ADSM release 2 servers came with lower montly costs, lower client fees, and and the addition of storage usage fees. Your VM release 1 server does not have the storage usage fees. Now what releas
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00058.html (12,250 bytes)

9. Re: ADSM and 3490E D42 Tape Drive (score: 1)
Author: Paul Zarnowski <VKM AT CORNELLC.CIT.CORNELL DOT EDU>
Date: Fri, 9 Dec 1994 14:47:06 EST
From the ADSM/6000 announcement letter, 293-687. I don't know what the fees are for the VM version. Prices: BASIC BASIC OTC MLC Base Feature for up to 25 GB of Managed Data on ADSM/6000 Server $ 3,75
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1994-12/msg00059.html (13,022 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu