Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+Network\s+Impact\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\s+Network\s+Impact\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. ADSM Network Impact (score: 1): Author: "Vincent J. Anderson" <T442407 AT RUTADMIN.RUTGERS DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 14:15:00 EST; I currently run a very small (10 clients) ADSM server. We are considering expanding service to several hundred and perhaps eventually several thousand additional clients. However, before we move forw; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-02/msg00524.html (12,046 bytes)
2. Re: ADSM Network Impact (score: 1): Author: "Prather, Wanda" <PrathW1 AT CENTRAL.SSD.JHUAPL DOT EDU>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 15:52:08 -0500; My two cents: We have been backing up servers at night, but are now planning to open up ADSM to many desktops. To get an estimate of the impact: * I installed ADSM on 10 desktops that I considered "p; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-02/msg00526.html (14,024 bytes)
3. Re: ADSM Network Impact (score: 1): Author: MATTHEW SPARKS 05-025 <msparks AT PINKERTONS DOT COM>; Date: Fri, 21 Feb 1997 14:53:04 -0800; I'm new to adsm so I could have this wrong. but even though during an incremental the amount of data can be small, don't you still need to consider the traffic going the other way, i.e., the server s; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-02/msg00529.html (11,335 bytes)
4. Re: ADSM Network Impact (score: 1): Author: "Larimer, Dave" <Dave_Larimer AT KNE DOT COM>; Date: Sun, 23 Feb 1997 12:16:33 -0700; Vincent, We have a 60 node system currently and my network people had the same questions. We put a sniffer on our network during load tests on the network. We had two systems. One was a FDDI, fiber o; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-02/msg00535.html (13,547 bytes)
5. Re: ADSM Network Impact (score: 1): Author: Jerry Lawson <jlawson AT THEHARTFORD DOT COM>; Date: Mon, 24 Feb 1997 08:00:29 -0500; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-02/msg00539.html (10,465 bytes)
6. Re: ADSM Network Impact (score: 1): Author: INTERNET.OWNERAD at SNADGATE; Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 18:10:12 -0500; Since that time we have not seen any major impacts - we are somewhere around 700 users now, with a leaning towards servers. We do ask people to use some common sense about some things - as you mentio; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-02/msg00540.html (13,556 bytes)
7. Re: ADSM Network Impact (score: 1): Author: nordi <nordi AT NUTECNET.COM DOT BR>; Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 08:34:30 -0300; Vince, We are installing ADSM in many UNIX (Sun Solaris) machines. Our primary goal is to have at least 15 Sun-Solaris machines in a "ADSM-compliant"solution. We are about to backup 20 Gb daily. We h; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1997-02/msg00562.html (14,145 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]