Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*ADSM\:\s+Tivoli\s+Data\s+Protection\s+for\s+Workgroups\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. ADSM: Tivoli Data Protection for Workgroups (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Janzen <OJANZEN AT DE.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 13:17:58 +0100
Does anyone have any experience with Tivoli Data Protection for Workgroups? I´m not sure whether it is or is not apllicable for the bare metal restore of Windows NT systems? Additionaly I´d like to k
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00798.html (10,873 bytes)

2. Re: ADSM: Tivoli Data Protection for Workgroups (score: 1)
Author: "Mann, Joseph" <mannjo AT FOSTERFARMS DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 08:47:21 -0800
What I believe is the TDPfW requires a local tape device. Which defeats the purpose of TSM. We are now doing our installation and I am working with this product. As of now, I am not going to use it.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00813.html (10,875 bytes)

3. ADSM: Tivoli Data Protection for Workgroups (score: 1)
Author: Oliver Janzen [mailto:OJANZEN AT DE.IBM DOT COM]
Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:35:06 -0500
Does anyone have any experience with Tivoli Data Protection for = Workgroups? I=B4m not sure whether it is or is not apllicable for the bare metal = restore of Windows NT systems? Additionaly I=B4d l
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00814.html (10,797 bytes)

4. Re: ADSM: Tivoli Data Protection for Workgroups (score: 1)
Author: "France, Don (Pace)" <don.france-eds AT EDS DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2000 12:23:23 -0600
The current implementation is for NT machines, works alot like the old Stac-Replica product (not a coincidence, rather a technology exchange/purchase) and requires a local tape device -- next release
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/2000-01/msg00817.html (12,087 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu