Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*3590\s+in\s+3494\s+ATL\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. 3590 in 3494 ATL (score: 1)
Author: David Ong <david AT BABYONG.NSC DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 10:52:01 -0700
We just added an expansion box to our current 3494 ATL over the weekend. The ATL now contains 4 3490E & 2 3590 drives. The 3590 drives are available to AIX and I have turned on ENABLE3590LIBRARY in t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1996-05/msg00211.html (10,778 bytes)

2. 3590 in 3494 ATL (score: 1)
Author: Jim Riehl <JIMBO AT TUCSON.VNET.IBM DOT COM>
Date: Tue, 14 May 1996 18:31:48 -0700
David, Have you created a device class with a devtype of 3590 for atlrobot library? Make sure you read the notes in the define library command (admin ref), regarding the additional scratch category a
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1996-05/msg00212.html (11,337 bytes)

3. Re: 3590 in 3494 ATL (score: 1)
Author: Sheelagh Treweek <sheelagh.treweek AT COMPUTING-SERVICES.OXFORD.AC DOT UK>
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 13:16:00 +0100
It was my understanding in September 1995 that there was no 3590 support in ADSM v1 at all; we ran a mixed 3490/3590 initially on ADSM v2. If you have already defined the 3590 device class, I would
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1996-05/msg00216.html (11,317 bytes)

4. Re: 3590 in 3494 ATL (score: 1)
Author: Brian Pennington <brian_pennington AT MAILLINK.CMIC DOT COM>
Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 10:21:37 EST
Make sure you are on the latest code for your 3494 and have the latest device drivers installed on AIX. ATL and I to environment. David, Have you created a device class with a devtype of 3590 for atl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1996-05/msg00217.html (11,613 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu