- 1. 3590 drive sharing in a 3494 (score: 1)
- Author: Dwight Cook <decook AT AMOCO DOT COM>
- Date: Thu, 1 Apr 1999 07:51:24 -0600
- Wasn't V3 going to allow sharing 3590 drives (within a 3494) between two different adsm servers ? ? ? So far I haven't found where this is discussed in the manuals... any clues ? ? ?
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-04/msg00022.html (10,324 bytes)
- 2. Re: 3590 drive sharing in a 3494 (score: 1)
- Author: Trevor Foley <Trevor.Foley AT BANKERSTRUST.COM DOT AU>
- Date: Tue, 6 Apr 1999 11:27:25 +1000
- Hi Dwight, The last time that I asked I was told that sharing drives within a 3494 between multiple ADSM servers was only OK if all of the ADSM servers were running on the same box. If the ADSM serve
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-04/msg00131.html (10,460 bytes)
- 3. 3590 drive sharing in a 3494 (score: 1)
- Author: Dwight Cook [mailto:decook AT AMOCO DOT COM]
- Date: Sun, 04 Oct 2015 17:44:48 -0500
- Wasn't V3 going to allow sharing 3590 drives (within a 3494) between two different adsm servers ? ? ? So far I haven't found where this is discussed in the manuals... any clues ? ? ?
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/ADSM-L/1999-04/msg00132.html (10,353 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu