Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\s+Amanda\s+questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*2\s+Amanda\s+questions\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: zevel <zevel AT lyd-systems DOT com>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:58:30 +0200; Hello Amanda Users, I've been through Docs and mans, and haven't found a definitive answer to my questions. I apologize up front if these are RTFM questions. 1) Does Amanda support LTO 3 formats ? 2); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00056.html (11,707 bytes)
2. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:18:40 +0100; zevel schreef: Hello Amanda Users, I've been through Docs and mans, and haven't found a definitive answer to my questions. I apologize up front if these are RTFM questions. 1) Does Amanda support LTO; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00057.html (12,859 bytes)
3. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: Paul Bijnens <paul.bijnens AT xplanation DOT com>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 14:34:24 +0100; Paul Bijnens schreef: zevel schreef: 2) Would it be possible to have Amanda backup the same data directory simultaneously to two LTO 3 drives ? The idea is to make 2 backups, one for normal restore o; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00058.html (12,587 bytes)
4. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: zevel <zevel AT lyd-systems DOT com>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:32:59 +0200; Thank you for your answers. Would it be safe to consider that RHEL 9 and/or FC4 would be able to support LTO3 ? Do I need to install ftape-tools or is this obsolete ? Cheers, Laurent. I've been throu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00063.html (12,748 bytes)
5. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: Gene Heskett <gene.heskett AT verizon DOT net>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 11:02:30 -0500; The stock reply, if mt can run the drive, then you're home free. With FC4, one might have to edit udev.conf to add a /dev/nst0, but that should be the extent of system requirements. ftape-tools are f; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00068.html (13,485 bytes)
6. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <sgw AT amanda DOT org>; Date: Sun, 05 Feb 2006 17:17:18 +0100; Gene Heskett schrieb: ftape-tools are for some jurassic tape drives that attached to a floppy controller. Typically much less than 1GB devices. I dare say zero usage of that rube goldburg contraption; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00071.html (12,161 bytes)
7. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: Jon LaBadie <jon AT jgcomp DOT com>; Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:19:42 -0500; Wasn't/Isn't there a directory for such "old and unmaintained" docs? -- Jon H. LaBadie jon AT jgcomp DOT com JG Computing 4455 Province Line Road (609) 252-0159 Princeton, NJ 08540-4322 (609) 683-722; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00077.html (12,377 bytes)
8. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <sgw AT amanda DOT org>; Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 11:58:29 +0100; Jon LaBadie schrieb: ftape-tools are for some jurassic tape drives that attached to a floppy controller. Typically much less than 1GB devices. I dare say zero usage of that rube goldburg contraption; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00091.html (12,889 bytes)
9. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: Joshua Baker-LePain <jlb17 AT duke DOT edu>; Date: Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:37:29 -0500 (EST); Thank you for your answers. Would it be safe to consider that RHEL 9 and/or FC4 would be able to support LTO3 ? Err, there's no such thing as RHEL 9. There's RH 9 (which I'd advise against, as it is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00098.html (12,480 bytes)
10. Re: 2 Amanda questions (score: 1): Author: zevel <zevel AT lyd-systems DOT com>; Date: Mon, 06 Feb 2006 18:47:19 +0200; Oops, of course, my mistake. I'd like to thank you all for your input, it really helps me a lot ! Laurent. Thank you for your answers. Would it be safe to consider that RHEL 9 and/or FC4 would be abl; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Amanda-Users/2006-02/msg00099.html (13,034 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]