Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+spmsur\.exe\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [nv-l] spmsur.exe (score: 1)
Author: Mohammed Quayum <MQUAYUM AT dm.gov DOT ae>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2004 08:19:40 +0400
Hi all, On my Netview server there are three processes running with the same name spmsur.exe. And one of this always taking 50% of CPU utilization. I checked on the Internet, I think it is related to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-02/msg00078.html (12,507 bytes)

2. Re: [nv-l] spmsur.exe (score: 1)
Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 09:52:11 -0500
If you examine the contents of \usr\ov\conf\ovsuf, you will find that there are three NetView daemons which are run by starting spmsur.exe: snmpserver, webserver, and servmon. spmsur.exe is used to p
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-02/msg00085.html (14,036 bytes)

3. Re: [nv-l] spmsur.exe (score: 1)
Author: Jane Curry <jane.curry AT skills-1st.co DOT uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 10:15:54 +0000
I also find the NetView Java daemons a pain. I don't find so much problem with CPU currently (though I'm not currently running a Web console). My issues are as follws: 1) They are hard to track - as
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-02/msg00089.html (12,577 bytes)

4. RE: [nv-l] spmsur.exe (score: 1)
Author: "Barr, Scott" <Scott_Barr AT csgsystems DOT com>
Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:12:47 -0600
I agree 100%. My issue is CPU performance not memory. I have seen in numerous cases where java processes are left "hung" after a user quits and still consume large (sometimes 40-50%) CPU. What I was
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-02/msg00093.html (13,448 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu