Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+question\s+on\s+snmpCollect\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+question\s+on\s+snmpCollect\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [nv-l] question on snmpCollect (score: 1): Author: Gang Cheng <gcheng AT cn.ibm DOT com>; Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 22:09:48 +0800; Hi, list, Got a question on snmpCollect's behavior. When I configure through xnmsnmpconf to collect data from all instances of a network device, what does snmpCollect do? I assume it will check, some; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-12/msg00050.html (12,262 bytes)
2. Re: [nv-l] question on snmpCollect (score: 1): Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Tue, 27 Dec 2005 09:43:41 -0500; You are laboring under something of a misconception. Your assumption of how the process works (" it will check, somewhere, what are the instances of the device and issue the snmpget against every ins; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-12/msg00051.html (15,485 bytes)
3. Re: [nv-l] question on snmpCollect (score: 1): Author: Gang Cheng <gcheng AT cn.ibm DOT com>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 10:43:53 +0800; Thanks, James, Based on what you explained, can I assume the behavior (snmpget+snmpnext) also applies to the snmpCollect configuration with LIST of instances? If this is the case, the difference betw; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-12/msg00052.html (21,376 bytes)
4. Re: [nv-l] question on snmpCollect (score: 1): Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2005 09:14:22 -0500; Gang, you are still thinking in terms of interfaces, and not instances. With a specific interface in the LIST, then a get is done for that instance, period. There's no need for a next. You would use; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-12/msg00054.html (19,429 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]