Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+SNMP\s+Trap\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+SNMP\s+Trap\s*$/: 9 ]

Total 9 documents matching your query.

1. [nv-l] SNMP Trap (score: 1): Author: ss tech <netviewteam AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Tue, 13 Jul 2004 20:24:04 -0700 (PDT); Hi All, I am a new user to Netview.I have Netview 7.1.4 and Switch Analyser 1.2.1 installed in Win2K I have Cisco 2950 & Cisco 3550 switches which are configured to send the trap to Netview,but I am; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-07/msg00066.html (11,305 bytes)
2. Re: [nv-l] SNMP Trap (score: 1): Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Wed, 14 Jul 2004 06:25:39 -0400; Well, possibly. If those Cisco devices are configured to send traps in SNMP V2 format, you will never see them in the current NetView for Windows. It cannot receive SNMP V2 traps. Only NetView for UN; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-07/msg00070.html (15,636 bytes)
3. Re: [nv-l] SNMP Trap (score: 1): Author: "Alaa Farrag" <alaahelmy1 AT hotmail DOT com>; Date: Sat, 17 Jul 2004 20:24:32 +0300; to make sure that the switch is using SNMP version 1 trap format do the following: telnet the switch ( you must have the telnet password & enable secret ) then apply the following commands ena (enter; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2004-07/msg00092.html (13,501 bytes)
4. [nv-l] snmp trap (score: 1): Author: "D'Apice, Dominic" <D.D'Apice AT SAQ.qc DOT ca>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 10:55:17 -0500; Hello, aix4.3.3, NV7.1 I just add some new snmp trap for firewall checkpoint. the output is a scripts with the 6 specific trap (coldstart,warmstart...). but when i receive firewall snmp trap i have t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2002-04/msg00331.html (11,762 bytes)
5. Re: [nv-l] snmp trap (score: 1): Author: netview AT toddh DOT net (Todd H.); Date: 04 Apr 2002 10:27:59 -0600; This is an enterprise-specific trap. I don't know who vendor 2620 is, but it looks like you could benefit from having additional traps defined. From the vabind data it appears to be telling you that; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2002-04/msg00332.html (12,376 bytes)
6. Re: [nv-l] snmp trap (score: 1): Author: "James Shanks" <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 11:37:41 -0500; Dominic - I am sorry to say that just because you format a trap using the vendor's MIB does not mean that the information in it is clear or obvious. Trapd is formatting the trap according to what he; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2002-04/msg00333.html (13,271 bytes)
7. Re: [nv-l] snmp trap (score: 1): Author: JamesFarrowII AT nisource DOT com; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:27:10 -0500; Generic: 6, Specific: 0 should always be a coldstart trap if it follows standards. FYI - You might want to load up the MIB for that .2620.1.1.11.0. Saw it on http://www.mibcentral.com James Farrow 48; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2002-04/msg00334.html (13,897 bytes)
8. RE: [nv-l] snmp trap (score: 1): Author: "D'Apice, Dominic" <D.D'Apice AT SAQ.qc DOT ca>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 12:54:56 -0500; James, what i receive from the firewall server is 1.3.6.1.4.1.2620.1.1. specific 0 but the output script from the mib vendor tell me another thing see file 1 (firewall.trap) i was thinking that when; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2002-04/msg00335.html (14,807 bytes)
9. RE: [nv-l] snmp trap (score: 1): Author: "James Shanks" <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Thu, 4 Apr 2002 13:07:15 -0500; Then it would appear that the MIB does not define the trap you received. So, yes, I would say you have to add it manually or find another MIB which defines it. James Shanks Level 3 Support for Tivoli; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2002-04/msg00336.html (15,283 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 9
Page: [1]