Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+NetView\s+6\.0\.2\s+\/\s+TEC\s+Integration\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+NetView\s+6\.0\.2\s+\/\s+TEC\s+Integration\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. [nv-l] NetView 6.0.2 / TEC Integration (score: 1): Author: z_esm_karekars <z_esm_karekars AT bharatpetroleum DOT com>; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 14:19:54 +0530; Hello, Any body has NetView - TEC Integration. Can you pls share the ruleset you are using for event forwarding other than forwardall. What type of baroc files are used for this integration Regards,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2002-05/msg00324.html (10,689 bytes)
2. Re: [nv-l] NetView 6.0.2 / TEC Integration (score: 1): Author: JamesFarrowII AT nisource DOT com; Date: Thu, 2 May 2002 09:22:09 -0400; Our netview ruleset is a monster because of the way that they want link_up/down traps thresholded to detect flappers. It also excludes all of the netview maintainence messages (node add, delete, etc.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2002-05/msg00325.html (12,152 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]