Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+Authentication\s+failure\s+traps\s+from\s+Windows\s+clients\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+Authentication\s+failure\s+traps\s+from\s+Windows\s+clients\s*$/: 10 ]

Total 10 documents matching your query.

1. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Van Order, Drew $US - Hermitage$" <dvanorder AT deloitte DOT com>; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 07:19:12 -0500; For grins have you unchecked the Send Authentication Trap box at each agent? That will stop the agent from sending if NV is causing the trouble during a poll. Otherwise it should just be a matter of; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-09/msg00001.html (21,217 bytes)
2. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Jon Austin" <AUSTINJ AT email.chop DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 02 Sep 2005 10:23:04 -0400; I'm starting to get a little concerned here myself. I'm getting ready in the next couple of months to set up an new environment as a major upgrade. Planning to use CIM agents to get my hardware traps; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-09/msg00002.html (18,986 bytes)
3. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Van Order, Drew $US - Hermitage$" <dvanorder AT deloitte DOT com>; Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2005 14:03:00 -0500; Based on my personal experience you will have a lot of continual maintenance and testing if you send HP hardware traps to NetView from each agent. Not only are there a huge number of traps across the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-09/msg00006.html (20,748 bytes)
4. [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn AT pemcocorp DOT com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 11:39:50 -0700; Running 7.1.4 FP3 on Redhat AS2.1 I am being bombarded with auth failure traps from some of my Windows 200x servers (not even a majority). Odd part is I can do a demand poll and run a sniffer trace a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-08/msg00192.html (13,765 bytes)
5. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Van Order, Drew $US - Hermitage$" <dvanorder AT deloitte DOT com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 15:04:07 -0500; I just finished cleaning something like this up last week. Your Windows servers are sending traps to the NV box and something's not matching so NV is creating authentication traps. You'll be able to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-08/msg00194.html (15,693 bytes)
6. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Evans, Bill" <Bill.Evans AT hq.doe DOT gov>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:32:54 -0400; I’m getting a different interesting result with authentication traps. NV 7.1.4 FP03 RH 3 TCPDUMP shows me problems where the community string is not present in the request, the packet is flagge; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-08/msg00196.html (36,840 bytes)
7. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn AT pemcocorp DOT com>; Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 16:21:29 -0700; Hi Drew, I will definitely check into this but since I've sent this message I've drawn closer (I think) to solving this issue. As it turns out, the boxes giving me grief all turned out to be HP/Compa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-08/msg00197.html (17,822 bytes)
8. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:18:58 -0400; Hi Bill, I don't know what to say about the missing community name, and if you suspect that is the case, then a PMR is certainly in order. But the issue of bad upd checksums may be a red herring. I'v; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-08/msg00201.html (12,657 bytes)
9. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Van Order, Drew $US - Hermitage$" <dvanorder AT deloitte DOT com>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:29:33 -0500; Your CIM agents send traps to NV as well as the HP SIM server? If so you have my sincerest condolences! We thought about doing this with our servers but HP changes MIBs more often than most and you n; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-08/msg00202.html (19,197 bytes)
10. RE: [nv-l] Authentication failure traps from Windows clients (score: 1): Author: "Glen Warn" <Glen.Warn AT pemcocorp DOT com>; Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2005 09:25:06 -0700; No, we only send them to NV (no CIM server here) We used to have a ported version of CIM for NV AIX but they abandoned it and only make a Solaris (I think) version now. If I stop the Insight Agent se; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2005-08/msg00204.html (20,431 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 10
Page: [1]