Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+\[NV\-L\]\:\s+Status\s+Polling\s+Public\s+Addresses\s+on\s+MSCS\s+Clusters\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[nv\-l\]\s+\[NV\-L\]\:\s+Status\s+Polling\s+Public\s+Addresses\s+on\s+MSCS\s+Clusters\s*$/: 5 ]

Total 5 documents matching your query.

1. [nv-l] [NV-L]: Status Polling Public Addresses on MSCS Clusters (score: 1): Author: "Jon Austin" <AUSTINJ AT email.chop DOT edu>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 11:14:10 -0500; I'm building up a new (greenfield) NV environment and looking toward implementing as much 'automated' status polling as possible. NV is forwarding to TEC using the out-of-the-box TEC_ITS ruleset, rul; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2006-03/msg00070.html (12,009 bytes)
2. Re: [nv-l] [NV-L]: Status Polling Public Addresses on MSCS Clusters (score: 1): Author: James Shanks <jshanks AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:00:47 -0500; Jon, I cannot follow much of this. I wouldn't know an MSCS Cluster from my sainted aunt, nor what the failover process was supposed to be, complete or not. But I do know a little something about the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2006-03/msg00073.html (14,912 bytes)
3. Re: [nv-l] [NV-L]: Status Polling Public Addresses on MSCS Clusters (score: 1): Author: "Jon Austin" <AUSTINJ AT email.chop DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:58:05 -0500; Sorry about that. My concerns at this point are more theoretical..... NV 714, FP4 MCSC Cluster - Microsoft Cluster, how almost all Microsoft High-Availability clusters get built. Think HACMP in AIX..; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2006-03/msg00104.html (16,074 bytes)
4. Re: [nv-l] [NV-L]: Status Polling Public Addresses on MSCS Clusters (score: 1): Author: Stephen Hochstetler <shochste AT us.ibm DOT com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:29:07 -0600; Jon, I don't think that in NV it would be deleted. The interface would simply go Red in an unsuccessful failover. Just because an interface is no longer found in a reading of the MIB does not cause N; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2006-03/msg00105.html (22,690 bytes)
5. Re: [nv-l] [NV-L]: Status Polling Public Addresses on MSCS Clusters (score: 1): Author: Francois Le Hir <flehir AT ca.ibm DOT com>; Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:05:40 -0500; If that interface is configured in the seed file for HSRP, then Netview is going to detect that it disappeared from one machine by doing an snmpget on the hostname and seeing that it's different than; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/nv-l/2006-03/msg00106.html (24,431 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 5
Page: [1]