Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+whats\s+wrong\s+with\s+my\s+calendar\s+based\s+backup\s*$/: 13 ]

Total 13 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: bob944 at attglobal.net (bob944)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 13:59:44 -0400
Gone over to the dark side, have you? That was mon_calendar and not mon_full or mon_inc? If it was freq-based, it should have as I'm sure you know. So it was cal-based? Since you made the policy act
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00269.html (20,135 bytes)

2. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: stumpb at michigan.gov (Bob Stump)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:33:06 -0400
My apologies for ever contemplating the use of calendar scheduling! Whatever was I thinking?? I fully understand frequency based scheduling and I will continue to use it until Control Data Corporatio
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00270.html (21,271 bytes)

3. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: JMARTI05 at intersil.com (Martin, Jonathan (Contractor))
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:50:04 -0400
LOL I use frequency based for daily and weekly backups. It works well. I also use calendar based scheduling to duplicate the weekly backup (in a different schedule of course) to run on the last day o
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00273.html (23,320 bytes)

4. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: bob944 at attglobal.net (bob944)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:54:19 -0400
And your documentation is what, exactly? If this is fact, _I_ want to know about it; please provide a pointer to your documentation and I'll apologize for the next sentence. If this extraordinary cl
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00275.html (12,957 bytes)

5. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: brooksje at longwood.edu (Brooks, Jason)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 14:57:32 -0400
I would second your vote Bob. When I read, in this thread, that having windows cross days was bad form, I thought to myself, "I would never get anything backed up if that was the case". Glad I'm not
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00276.html (23,816 bytes)

6. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: bob944 at attglobal.net (bob944)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:41:20 -0400
Assuming you are referring to perhaps I could have explicitly stated that everything in the note applied to calendar-based scheduling. And 268400 is the technote reference to which the interested re
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00277.html (13,414 bytes)

7. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: Jonathan.Marks at ftc.usda.gov (Marks, Jonathan - Fort Collins, CO)
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:52:27 -0600
I do not have documentation for my specific error. I called in Case 280-593-264 to Veritas support for help with my issue. I have used calendar based scheduling for 3 years now and have used it on 5.
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00282.html (16,277 bytes)

8. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: Tristan.Ball at vsl.com.au (Tristan Ball)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:33:05 +1000
I've had similar experiences with 6.0mp2, both calender and frequency based schedules. It seems that the PEM gets confused about which schedules are running/have run. For us, the fix has been to shut
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00283.html (17,312 bytes)

9. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: Jonathan.Marks at ftc.usda.gov (Marks, Jonathan - Fort Collins, CO)
Date: Wed, 14 Jun 2006 10:11:02 -0600
Support had me stop Netbackup and remove the file and then start Netbackup. I was told it would recreate that "pempersist" file. It did recreate the file but did not help get my fulls to run. I was u
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00307.html (18,577 bytes)

10. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: bob944 at attglobal.net (bob944)
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 03:40:25 -0400
Jonathan, I duplicated your symptoms today. Took a Solaris 9 NetBackup 5.1MP4 lab server, added the simplest possible policy to it with a frequency-based schedule and over-midnight window. Copied th
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00316.html (15,559 bytes)

11. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: ewilts at ewilts.org (Ed Wilts)
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 06:18:16 -0500
Consider yourself lucky. We've had nothing but grief since upgrading to 6.0MP2. Even frequency-based backups were't scheduling properly. We've applied several engineering bundles, spent countless hou
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00320.html (14,604 bytes)

12. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: Jonathan.Marks at ftc.usda.gov (Marks, Jonathan - Fort Collins, CO)
Date: Thu, 15 Jun 2006 10:42:47 -0600
Which run days did you have checked. The one for the start of the start windows, The end day of the start window or both. Were you trying to get more than one full per week? I am using Solaris 9 just
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00334.html (20,122 bytes)

13. [Veritas-bu] whats wrong with my calendar based backup (score: 1)
Author: bob944 at attglobal.net (bob944)
Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2006 23:12:00 -0400
I checked 'em all--recurring days of week, Sun-Sat. Just looked at the test server, and it's done a calendar-based backup each night at the start of the 2300-2200 window. No real plan; was just sett
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2006-06/msg00345.html (21,782 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu