Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+veritas\s+netbackup\s+6\.5\s+encrypt\s+backup\s+tape\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+veritas\s+netbackup\s+6\.5\s+encrypt\s+backup\s+tape\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] veritas netbackup 6.5 encrypt backup tape (score: 1): Author: novice123 <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:59:17 -0800; Dear All, During a risk assessment exercise, I realized that my backup admin does not encrypt data in backup tapes. He argues, it is not required as an adversary cannot recover/read data from the bac; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-11/msg00136.html (12,706 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] veritas netbackup 6.5 encrypt backup tape (score: 1): Author: "Justin Piszcz" <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 04:00:36 -0500; Hi, Not true, you can bpimport the tape, its two phases (with NBU) and takes 2-4 hours per tape, this re-creates the catalog data from the tape media itself. Read more here: http://www.symantec.com/b; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-11/msg00137.html (13,751 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] veritas netbackup 6.5 encrypt backup tape (score: 1): Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT water DOT com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 14:47:54 +0000; Additionally for Linux/UNIX at least the format written on tape is using a modified version of GNU Tar so one could get the raw data using GNU Tar or even dd so you don't even need NetBackup's import; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-11/msg00139.html (16,378 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] veritas netbackup 6.5 encrypt backup tape (score: 1): Author: John Berchmans <pjberchmans AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 09:55:23 -0800 (PST); Please read some of the limitations of encrypting backups using software or drive based encryption: == Limitations of using software-based encryption: Disaster recovery is not supported with encrypte; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-11/msg00141.html (20,030 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] veritas netbackup 6.5 encrypt backup tape (score: 1): Author: "Robyn Hirano" <robyn.hirano AT roddconsulting.com DOT au>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 06:35:05 +1100; Dear Sanjay Nefarious, I understand why you've used novice123 and not said who you work for, (and it's not on the profile you put on backup central) but I thought I'd use your name that came through.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-11/msg00142.html (14,294 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] veritas netbackup 6.5 encrypt backup tape (score: 1): Author: David Stanaway <david AT stanaway DOT net>; Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2011 22:05:15 -0600; You can always import images from a tape. Takes a while. Its also extractable even without NBU involved, esp if not multiplexed. This isn't true. I encrypt my backups AND catalogs. (Just make sure yo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-11/msg00144.html (12,962 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] veritas netbackup 6.5 encrypt backup tape (score: 1): Author: "smpt" <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 19:02:29 +0200; Disaster recovery is not supported with encrypted backups. Therefore you must not encrypt backups used for Disaster Recovery restore This is true only if you do not replicate the keys. With library K; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-11/msg00146.html (20,974 bytes)
8. Re: [Veritas-bu] veritas netbackup 6.5 encrypt backup tape (score: 1): Author: David Stanaway <david AT stanaway DOT net>; Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:42:12 -0600; The NBU KMS db is small and static (Only changes when you run the kms commands to move keys through lifecycle stages, or add new keys). This is easy to keep synchronized with your recovery master ser; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-11/msg00147.html (12,599 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]