Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+v5\.0\s+or\s+v5\.1\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+v5\.0\s+or\s+v5\.1\?\s*$/: 12 ]

Total 12 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: wtsmith AT maine DOT edu (Wayne T Smith); Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:50:52 -0400; My media kits for v5.1 just arrived, so now I'm wondering ... Should I stay with v5.0 or move to v5.1 (solaris server, if that matters)? There has been much discussion of v5.0 on this mailing list an; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00181.html (11,900 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: Mark.Donaldson AT cexp DOT com (Mark.Donaldson AT cexp DOT com); Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 16:00:30 -0600; FWIW, I'm interested in this info, too, so posting to the list would be appreciated. -M --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.e; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00183.html (12,821 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: Tie_Hoekstra AT kaltire DOT com (Tie_Hoekstra AT kaltire DOT com); Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:29:46 -0700; We have been on 5.1 for about a month now, due to problems with 4.5FP6, and no major issues have come up as of yet. We backup Oracle, Solaris, SCO, Windows, and Exchange. Just about all of our client; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00184.html (13,794 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: jbenson AT neurome DOT com (Jon D. Benson); Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 15:41:56 -0700; Tie Can you elaborate on what you mean by "Not entirely smooth upgrade?" I think hearing about any "gotchyas" would be helpful for the list. Thanks! -- Jon D. Benson Network Systems Administrator Neu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00185.html (15,052 bytes)
5. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: charles.hart AT medtronic DOT com (Hart, Charles); Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 08:26:54 -0500; Great info, is anyone using 5.0/5.1 with SSO on Unix and Windows2K? Regards, Charles --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00198.html (14,519 bytes)
6. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA (Karl.Rossing AT Federated DOT CA); Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 11:43:45 -0500; This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 005BE56B86256EED_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" I read threw the release notes and there were no features that i needed to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00204.html (17,231 bytes)
7. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: dmm4n AT diablo.itc.Virginia DOT EDU (Diane Meeker); Date: Wed, 11 Aug 2004 10:28:38 -0400 (EDT); Yes, we just went live yesterday in an SSO environment. -- Diane Meeker ladydi AT virginia DOT edu University of Virginia 434-924-4182; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00267.html (16,078 bytes)
8. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: sjacobso AT novell DOT com (Scott Jacobson); Date: Sat, 14 Aug 2004 11:39:50 -0600; I've been on 5.1 as soon as it came available. Upgraded from 5.0 GA, no problems. I'm using a W2K Master with 4+ Linux media servers (SLES 8) each using QLogic HBA's and zoned to see four HP LTO II t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00275.html (17,379 bytes)
9. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: cuyler.dingwell AT eds DOT com (Dingwell, Cuyler); Date: Mon, 16 Aug 2004 13:22:42 -0400; There is a known issues with the make_scsi_dev under Linux. It will not create the /dev/st files if there are tapes in the drives even for another media server in an SSO'd environment. If one doesn't; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00284.html (18,543 bytes)
10. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: wtsmith AT maine DOT edu (Wayne T Smith); Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 16:23:03 -0400; Thanks to everyone that has participated in this thread! I also received some private replies from a few people. They were quite happy with the v5.1 release. Most everyone related their experience, a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00349.html (13,173 bytes)
11. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com (Scott Jacobson); Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2004 15:52:18 -0600; This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=__Part47672882.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00351.html (17,882 bytes)
12. [Veritas-bu] v5.0 or v5.1? (score: 1): Author: cuyler.dingwell AT eds DOT com (Dingwell, Cuyler); Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 12:53:44 -0400; This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01C48931.C04C55CC Content-Type: text/plain Ju; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-08/msg00389.html (21,083 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 12
Page: [1]