Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+performance\s+on\s+windows\s+cluster\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+performance\s+on\s+windows\s+cluster\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] performance on windows cluster (score: 1): Author: Kevin Corley <Kevin.Corley AT apollogrp DOT edu>; Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 16:49:04 -0700; Anybody running a clustered 6.5.x or 7.0 master on Windows 2003 or 2008 with MSCS? Looking at this option for a new 10,000+ job per night master. Any comments are appreciated. This message is private; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-05/msg00032.html (11,658 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] performance on windows cluster (score: 1): Author: "WEAVER, Simon $external$" <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>; Date: Thu, 6 May 2010 10:02:22 +0100; Hi Kevin I do not want to be a downer on Clustering, as I quite like MS Clustering, but the reason why I would be looking at Clustering the Master is due to "High Availability" of that application. H; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-05/msg00036.html (15,229 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] performance on windows cluster (score: 1): Author: WALLEBROEK Bart <Bart.WALLEBROEK AT swift DOT com>; Date: Fri, 7 May 2010 16:09:38 +0200; Message: 4 Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 16:49:04 -0700 From: Kevin Corley <Kevin.Corley AT apollogrp DOT edu> Subject: [Veritas-bu] performance on windows cluster To: "VERITAS-BU AT MAILMAN.ENG.AUBURN DOT E; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-05/msg00048.html (12,423 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]