Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+duplication\s+vs\s+multiple\s+copies\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] duplication vs multiple copies (score: 1)
Author: dave.markham AT fjserv DOT net (Dave Markham)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 13:51:55 +0000
Im after some advice. Netbackup 5.0 MP3 on Solaris with 2 media servers. I backup my network clients over night and have a requirement for offsite storage. In order to keep a restore capability on si
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-12/msg00349.html (11,688 bytes)

2. [Veritas-bu] duplication vs multiple copies (score: 1)
Author: jason.doyle AT aqssys DOT com (Jason Doyle)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 17:08:04 -0600
I use the session_notify script which executes after a series of backups finish. I had to do some tricky stuff so that it does not execute after a User backup or user archive (had backup_exit_notify
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-12/msg00367.html (13,580 bytes)

3. [Veritas-bu] duplication vs multiple copies (score: 1)
Author: kris.williams AT hp DOT com (Williams, Kristopher L)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 19:20:17 -0600
If your working on a Windows server, you can use the start command inside the session_notify. It will start the duplication command and exit back into session_notify. Session_notify will continue to
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-12/msg00369.html (14,662 bytes)

4. [Veritas-bu] duplication vs multiple copies (score: 1)
Author: Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com> (Dean)
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 12:46:32 +1100
Using inline copy should be more efficient than taking the backup then running bpduplicate later. Using inline copy, to take a one hour backup, you will use two tape drives for one hour = 2 "tape dri
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-12/msg00371.html (12,859 bytes)

5. [Veritas-bu] duplication vs multiple copies (score: 1)
Author: David Rock <dave-bu AT graniteweb DOT com> (David Rock)
Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2004 20:30:23 -0600
--LQksG6bCIzRHxTLp Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable * Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com> [2004-12-30 12:46]: Unless t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-12/msg00373.html (12,216 bytes)

6. [Veritas-bu] duplication vs multiple copies (score: 1)
Author: DMoses AT leviton DOT com (Moses, Darby)
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:22:26 -0500
Don't you have to have a Vault license to perform an inline tape duplication? Best Regards, Darby Moses
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-12/msg00375.html (14,157 bytes)

7. [Veritas-bu] duplication vs multiple copies (score: 1)
Author: dave.markham AT fjserv DOT net (Dave Markham)
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 16:15:36 +0000
So an inlinecopy using the multiple copies of a schedule is recommended. Ok Does any one then know how i can identify tapes used for just the second copy? I will be using a different tape pool, but c
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-12/msg00376.html (12,809 bytes)

8. [Veritas-bu] duplication vs multiple copies (score: 1)
Author: Mark.Donaldson AT cexp DOT com (Mark.Donaldson AT cexp DOT com)
Date: Thu, 30 Dec 2004 10:35:43 -0700
v5.X of NB allows inline-tape-copy native to the base application. It's no longer part of vault. For versions before 5.x, ITC is part of Vault. -M --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailm
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2004-12/msg00378.html (15,075 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu