Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+catalog\s+performance\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] catalog performance (score: 1)
Author: "Asiye Yigit" <asiye.yigit AT gantek DOT com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 12:06:36 +0300
Hello all; We have three parts in netbackup catalog: image, configuration, relational database. Do you suggest to separate some of them into different file systems? /usr/openv is on different SAN fil
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00046.html (11,720 bytes)

2. Re: [Veritas-bu] catalog performance (score: 1)
Author: "WEAVER, Simon \(external\)" <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:18:03 +0100
You may want to look at this... http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=TECH144969&key=15143&actp=LIST I for one prefer to keep everything in one location on a RAID5 Volume, an
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00047.html (14,593 bytes)

3. Re: [Veritas-bu] catalog performance (score: 1)
Author: <Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2011 10:16:58 -0500
The question to ask is if you are seeing (or suspect) any degraded performance due to high catalog activity? If you aren't, then I wouldn't worry about the cost or complexity of splitting up your cat
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00051.html (16,987 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu