Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Which\s+is\s+Best\s+for\s+My\s+NetBackup\s+Master\s+\-\s+32\s+or\s+64\s+Bit\s+Operating\s+System\s+\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ? (score: 1)
Author: <Karthikeyan.Sundaram AT cognizant DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 13:34:30 +0530
Hello there, We are in process of setting up a New Backup Setup, Currently all our Location NetBackup Master Servers running in 32 bit Windows 2003 operating system. I have some doubts in choosing my
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-07/msg00138.html (13,656 bytes)

2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ? (score: 1)
Author: Michael Graff Andersen <mian71 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 14:11:52 +0200
Hello   In general 64 bit is faster and can handle more memory (no 4 GB limit), so 64 bit will probably do better But as always it depends on your setup   Regards Michael 2009/7/16 <Karthikeyan.Sunda
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-07/msg00139.html (14,834 bytes)

3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ? (score: 1)
Author: <Karthikeyan.Sundaram AT cognizant DOT com>
Date: Thu, 16 Jul 2009 17:43:26 +0530
Thanks Michel ! From: Michael Graff Andersen [mailto:mian71 AT gmail DOT com] Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 5:42 PM To: Sundaram, Karthikeyan (Cognizant) Cc: veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-07/msg00140.html (16,732 bytes)

4. Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ? (score: 1)
Author: <Karthikeyan.Sundaram AT cognizant DOT com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 13:41:52 +0530
Hello there, Thanks a lot for your response guys ! My master is running in Windows 2003 32 bit operating system with 8 GB RAM. Is my master utilizing this full 8GB of RAM ? if not how can I make my m
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-07/msg00164.html (18,355 bytes)

5. Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ? (score: 1)
Author: tim burlowski <tim.burlowski AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:15:36 -0500
All: I wanted to chime in on this conversation and take the time to mention two things. You should all familiarize yourself with the Compatibility list and the  6.5 Release Notes, End of Life section
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-07/msg00181.html (20,011 bytes)

6. Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ? (score: 1)
Author: tim burlowski <tim.burlowski AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:22:09 -0500
That last sentence should read "one 32 bit NetBackup server platform, Windows 2003 x86-64." -- tim burlowski http://timbu.org/mtblog All: I wanted to chime in on this conversation and take the time t
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-07/msg00182.html (20,382 bytes)

7. Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ? (score: 1)
Author: Ed Wilts <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:34:36 -0500
I have some doubts in choosing my NetBackup Master server OS Bit Version. We have both 32 and 64 bit OS's. Which will do better in my NetBackup setup either 32 bit or 64 bit. In general, NetBackup 64
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-07/msg00183.html (14,285 bytes)

8. Re: [Veritas-bu] Which is Best for My NetBackup Master - 32 or 64 Bit Operating System ? (score: 1)
Author: tim burlowski <tim.burlowski AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2009 16:39:57 -0500
One last try. The last sentence should read "The net result of reading the footnotes indicates that there will be one 32 bit NetBackup server platform, Windows 2003 x86-32". Thanks Ed! That last sent
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-07/msg00184.html (21,661 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu