Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Transition\s+from\s+LTO1\s+to\s+LTO4\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Transition\s+from\s+LTO1\s+to\s+LTO4\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 (score: 1): Author: Jorge Fábregas <jorge.fabregas AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2009 22:14:59 -0400; Hello everyone, We're considering switching from our old ADIC Scalar 1000 (with LTO1 drives) to an HP MSL8096 (4 drives). The logical step will be to go the LTO3 route so we can read our old media bu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-08/msg00197.html (11,296 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 (score: 1): Author: Dennis Peacock <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:23:21 -0400; Why not keep your old library for historical restores and put in your new LTO-4 library for current and future backups/restores? Would be easier and less trouble over time. [Wink] +-- +-- ___________; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-08/msg00209.html (12,329 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 (score: 1): Author: "Jeff Lightner" <jlightner AT water DOT com>; Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 09:30:06 -0400; I imagine for the same reasons they bought the new library in the first place (e.g. age of library, support/parts etc...) plus the added reason that it takes up floor space in the data center. Data c; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-08/msg00210.html (14,064 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 (score: 1): Author: "WEAVER, Simon $external$" <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>; Date: Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:38:53 +0100; Would it not just be easier to configure one of the drives to read LTO4 and saving space and removing the old equipment in the first place? Or am I looking at this all wrong ! Simon --Original Messag; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-08/msg00211.html (14,005 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 (score: 1): Author: Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 04:01:58 +1000; Simon, I assume you mean "Would it not just be easier to configure one of the drives to read LTO1" ?? If so, that means that drive would *ONLY* be able to read LTO1. And assuming you never want to wr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-08/msg00221.html (16,803 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 (score: 1): Author: Jorge Fábregas <jorge.fabregas AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:27:54 -0400; Thank you Dean and the others for the comments. Yes, indeed it is not possible to reuse the old drives on the new library. We decided to get the 4 drives as LTO4 and initially we were going to get a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-08/msg00228.html (12,864 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 (score: 1): Author: "bob944" <bob944 AT attglobal DOT net>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:05:12 -0400; Yes, if you're going to mix them. LTO4s are automatically detected as hcart and so are LTO1s. So when you add the LTO4 drives, change them to anything else--LTO2... 8MM, whatever, and set up barcode; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-08/msg00230.html (12,519 bytes)
8. Re: [Veritas-bu] Transition from LTO1 to LTO4 (score: 1): Author: Jorge Fábregas <jorge.fabregas AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:58:14 -0400; Thanks for the tip. I didn't know about the barcode rules ! That sounds like a nice mini-project. I totally agree and will look forward for doing it. The fact that I can consolidate, at least, about; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-08/msg00232.html (12,120 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]