- 1. [Veritas-bu] Sol10 (score: 1)
- Author: mrkww at uab.edu (Kenneth W Wilkinson)
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 11:26:26 -0500
- Anybody running Solaris 10 and NB6.0? Any issues you see with it? kww -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/pipermail/veritas-bu/attachments/20070517/a
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00403.html (10,530 bytes)
- 2. [Veritas-bu] Sol10 (score: 1)
- Author: sq01 at yorku.ca (Steve Quan)
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:33:36 -0400 (EDT)
- We're running Solaris10 on our media servers (for about 3 weeks now).
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00404.html (10,485 bytes)
- 3. [Veritas-bu] Sol10 (score: 1)
- Author: pkeating at bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Keating)
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:52:02 -0400
- Hey Steve. Have you "tuned" the OS in any way? Specifically with Sol8/9 there were many /etc/system entries required for optimal (functional?) performance when the system is under load. I understand
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00405.html (13,728 bytes)
- 4. [Veritas-bu] Sol10 (score: 1)
- Author: mrkww at uab.edu (Kenneth W Wilkinson)
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 12:11:40 -0500
- I'm in the same boat. I'm about to 10 on a T2000 and upgrade to 6.0 all at the same time.....yuck --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bounces at mailman.eng.auburn.edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces at
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00407.html (14,465 bytes)
- 5. [Veritas-bu] Sol10 (score: 1)
- Author: sq01 at yorku.ca (Steve Quan)
- Date: Thu, 17 May 2007 15:23:25 -0400 (EDT)
- We're running "vanilla". We'd inquired about this, and was directed to the NetBackup Tuning Guide (pgs 152 - 155) and related Sun documentation. Based on this, it doesn't appear as if the old changes
- /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00416.html (14,867 bytes)
This search system is powered by
Namazu