Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Seagate\s+LTO\s+Drives\/Fuji\s+Tapes\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Seagate\s+LTO\s+Drives\/Fuji\s+Tapes\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Seagate LTO Drives/Fuji Tapes (score: 1): Author: charles.somogyi AT bms DOT com (Charles R Somogyi); Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 12:54:44 -0400; Hello All: We have installed a 3.4 DC Master (SUN V880 and L700 w/ 20 Seagate LTO Gen1 drives using Fuji tapes). We have had excessive amounts of mangled tapes, stuck tapes and tape pins that are off; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-05/msg00513.html (11,061 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Seagate LTO Drives/Fuji Tapes (score: 1): Author: cfeskens AT willamette DOT edu (Casey J Feskens); Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 10:02:35 -0700 (PDT); I've been running Seagate Drives and Fuji media for almost 2 years and haven't seen any problems. Of course we're low volume (.5TB/week), but I have had far fewer problems with Fuji than we did with; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-05/msg00516.html (11,778 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] Seagate LTO Drives/Fuji Tapes (score: 1): Author: Ebon_Nash AT compuware DOT com (Nash, Ebon); Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 13:24:09 -0400; Interesting. We have been using DLT7000 drives and found that Fuji tapes were much less reliable than Maxell tapes. In fact, we have stopped using Fuji tapes altogether. We process about 7GB/week ove; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-05/msg00519.html (13,056 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] Seagate LTO Drives/Fuji Tapes (score: 1): Author: WTSmith AT maine DOT edu (Wayne T Smith); Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:15:17 -0400; Charles R Somogyi wrote, in part: We have NBU/DC 4.5 with an L700e, 4 Seagate LTO-1 drives and see almost no tape errors on our Fuji tapes ... no problems such as you have described. Sorry! cheers, w; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-05/msg00525.html (11,181 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]