Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+SSO\s+\/\s+LTO\s+performance\s+issues\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+SSO\s+\/\s+LTO\s+performance\s+issues\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] SSO / LTO performance issues (score: 1): Author: l_billson AT hotmail DOT com (Lawrence Billson); Date: Thu, 09 Aug 2001 10:11:41 +1000; Hi guys, I'm getting some pretty poor performance from my Netbackup setup. My current system is: An STK L700 robot with 6 LTO tape units - four of which are connected to a fiber/scsi bridge. This is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-08/msg00126.html (12,081 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] SSO / LTO performance issues (score: 1): Author: Andrew Shinkarev <shinkara AT pprd.abbott DOT com> (Andrew Shinkarev); Date: Wed, 8 Aug 2001 21:27:52 -0500; Which HBA are you using on 6800? JNI? What SCSI<->Bridges ? STK? -- -- Andrew Shinkarev Network Systems Specialist Abbott Laboratories (847) 9387559 shinkara AT pprd.abbott DOT com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-08/msg00127.html (13,338 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] SSO / LTO performance issues (score: 1): Author: larry.kingery AT veritas DOT com (Larry Kingery); Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2001 11:15:02 -0400 (EDT); A VERBOSE bptm log would be helpful. Let's think about what's different between ufsdump and NBU to see if we can find a bottleneck. Judging from the horrible 200KB/s, I doubt altering the NBU buffer; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-08/msg00135.html (12,375 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]