Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Running\s+NOM\s+on\s+a\s+VM\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Running\s+NOM\s+on\s+a\s+VM\.\.\.\.\.\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM..... (score: 1): Author: "ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]" <randy.k.zimmer AT monsanto DOT com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 14:56:24 -0500; All, Is anyone running their NOM server on a VM (linux or windows)? I was at a conference last week at Symantec and they did a demo of the product running the NOM server on a VM but said it wasn&#821; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00050.html (14,349 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM..... (score: 1): Author: "Curtis Preston" <cpreston AT glasshouse DOT com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:16:44 -0400; NOM is just an app and it shouldn’t/doesn’t care/know that it’s running on a VM. If you ever called support, would you even mention the hardware something is running on? You’r; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00051.html (16,996 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM..... (score: 1): Author: "rcarlisle" <rcarlisle AT serverwarecorp DOT com>; Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 16:46:28 -0400; When I asked, this is the official response I received, although just because it has not been qualified does not mean that it will not work: The VBR server has been tested in VMWare. Of course, there; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00052.html (20,229 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM..... (score: 1): Author: "jim fred" <jim.fred01 AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 07:53:18 +1000; Given the wintel background of Symantec you thought it would have been done by now. Likewise for master server & EMM server running on VMWARE. It substantially simplies high availability. ___________; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00053.html (11,293 bytes)
5. [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM..... (score: 1): Author: ddierickx <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Fri, 12 Oct 2007 00:56:35 -0700; we do this, running in windows on vmware. works just fine. +-- +-- _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu http://mailman.eng.au; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00169.html (11,293 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM..... (score: 1): Author: "ZIMMER, RANDY K [AG/1000]" <randy.k.zimmer AT monsanto DOT com>; Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2007 19:33:18 -0500; How any masters are you monitoring? Thanks, Randy K. Zimmer Sr. Unix System Administrator Office: 314-694-3109 Cell: 314-960-0500 rkzimm AT monsanto DOT com we do this, running in windows on vmware.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00207.html (13,142 bytes)
7. [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM..... (score: 1): Author: ddierickx <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 03:00:32 -0700; only 1 (one) for the moment, NOM doesn't need to be fast for us, so it is not really an issue at this point in time. +-- +-- _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00242.html (11,365 bytes)
8. Re: [Veritas-bu] Running NOM on a VM..... (score: 1): Author: "Rockey Reed" <rockey_reed AT symantec DOT com>; Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 07:48:34 -0700; NOM can be I/O intensive at times and VM doesn't virtualize VM too well. YMMV! Thanks, Rockey J. Reed You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the best you can every day. Ma; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00247.html (12,377 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]