Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Reducing\s+Netbackup\s+reserved\s+ports\s+on\s+the\s+master\s+server\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Reducing\s+Netbackup\s+reserved\s+ports\s+on\s+the\s+master\s+server\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master server (score: 1): Author: "Anders Thome" <anders.thome AT ementor DOT no>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 07:56:40 +0200; Hi! Anyone know what the impact of reducing the number of reserved ports on at netbackup master server is? The Default is 512-1023….. If we reduce it to ie. 512-600…. Will that mean that; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00037.html (12,641 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master server (score: 1): Author: "Steven L. Sesar" <ssesar AT mitre DOT org>; Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:23:13 -0400; Use vnetd. Anders Thome wrote: Hi! Anyone know what the impact of reducing the number of reserved ports on at netbackup master server is? The Default is 512-1023….. If we reduce it to ie. 512-6; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00040.html (13,886 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master server (score: 1): Author: Blaine Robison <blaine_robison AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Wed, 5 Sep 2007 06:45:03 -0700 (PDT); Why not use vnetd. If it is 6.0 or above a 6.0 client and server use port 13724 ( vnetd ) to communicate. In 5.1 you have to configure it. Blaine Robison Solaris Ceritfied System Administrator Solari; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00041.html (13,310 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master server (score: 1): Author: "Steven L. Sesar" <ssesar AT mitre DOT org>; Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 09:53:59 -0400; Although be careful: there is/was a bug (feature?) in NBU which may prevent you from performing synthetic full backups across a firewall. The firewalled client makes a call back to the master server; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00042.html (14,689 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master server (score: 1): Author: <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>; Date: Wed, 05 Sep 2007 17:59:00 +0300; Read this VERITAS NetBackup (tm) 6.0 Port Usage Guide for Windows and UNIX Platforms http://ftp.support.veritas.com/pub/support/products/NetBackup_Enterprise_Server/281623.pdf If you use nbu 6.x you; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00043.html (13,341 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master server (score: 1): Author: "Anders Thome" <anders.thome AT ementor DOT no>; Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2007 07:21:35 +0200; Yes.. but the problem is that most of the clients are Netware.. and seems they aren't very fond of vnetd Anders --Original Message-- From: Blaine Robison [mailto:blaine_robison AT yahoo DOT com] Sent; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00057.html (14,008 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] Reducing Netbackup reserved ports on the master server (score: 1): Author: "Martin Ruslan" <mit.martin AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Sun, 9 Sep 2007 12:13:31 +0700; A bit curious.. why you're very2 not recommend to use security? :) Regards, mTz On 9/5/07, smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr> wrote: Read this VERITAS NetBackup (tm) 6.0 Port Usage Guide; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00119.html (14,558 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]