Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+RE\:\s+Netbackup\s+NDMP\s+vs\.\s+regular\s+NBK\s+client\s+$Kenne\s+dy\,\s+Jeffrey$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+RE\:\s+Netbackup\s+NDMP\s+vs\.\s+regular\s+NBK\s+client\s+$Kenne\s+dy\,\s+Jeffrey$\s*$/: 1 ]

Total 1 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] RE: Netbackup NDMP vs. regular NBK client (Kenne dy, Jeffrey) (score: 1): Author: Mark.Hickey AT hds DOT com (Mark Hickey); Date: Fri, 11 Feb 2005 06:12:22 -0800; You are right about the restore penalty in the case of NDMP serving block storage. I missed that part. Mark DAR is Direct Access Restore, to do exactly what you said; address the tape block with the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2005-02/msg00241.html (14,884 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 1
Page: [1]