Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Prioritizing\s+Restores\s+over\s+Backups\s+in\s+4\.5\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Prioritizing\s+Restores\s+over\s+Backups\s+in\s+4\.5\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Prioritizing Restores over Backups in 4.5 (score: 1): Author: williams.k.1 AT pg DOT com (williams.k.1 AT pg DOT com); Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2003 21:27:09 -0400; This is a multipart message in MIME format. --=_alternative 0007FC7A85256D9D_= Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Does anyone know of a way to make restores that are queued, along with othe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-09/msg00141.html (12,670 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Prioritizing Restores over Backups in 4.5 (score: 1): Author: ssesar AT mitre DOT org (Steven L. Sesar); Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:56:00 -0400; This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --ms070407020701030509070401 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I don't think so. W; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-09/msg00148.html (16,401 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] Prioritizing Restores over Backups in 4.5 (score: 1): Author: boatm005 AT groupwise.umn DOT edu (Paul Boatman); Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:40:24 -0500; I am very interested in this as well. We have had a few issues with this lately. Leaving a few drives "inactive" in case of a potential restore is NOT an option. Because of lack of slow backup speeds; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-09/msg00149.html (12,017 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] Prioritizing Restores over Backups in 4.5 (score: 1): Author: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com (Donaldson, Mark); Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:15:03 -0600; I believe the next version is promising the ability to "pause" a backup, allowing a restore to slip in, then restart the backup. I'm attending an overview seminar next week, I'll try to remember to p; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-09/msg00151.html (12,873 bytes)
5. [Veritas-bu] Prioritizing Restores over Backups in 4.5 (score: 1): Author: charles.hart AT medtronic DOT com (Hart, Charles); Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:19:37 -0500; Oh.. I can't hold it in. I'm a fairly new user to Netbackup 4.5FP#, have been using TSM for a couple years, and I find this troubling. In the TSM world Restores Always take precedence. If another tas; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-09/msg00152.html (13,201 bytes)
6. [Veritas-bu] Prioritizing Restores over Backups in 4.5 (score: 1): Author: ssesar AT mitre DOT org (Steven L. Sesar); Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:33:34 -0400; This is a cryptographically signed message in MIME format. --ms030209010808020303090500 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit I think that restores; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-09/msg00154.html (19,567 bytes)
7. [Veritas-bu] Prioritizing Restores over Backups in 4.5 (score: 1): Author: WTSmith AT maine DOT edu (Wayne T Smith); Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2003 09:38:34 -0400; Hart, Charles wrote, in part: You did! Join the club. Nothing is perfect, though that Cadillac was pretty good. ;-) cheers, wayne; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2003-09/msg00155.html (11,671 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]