Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Point\s+in\s+Time\s+Bare\s+Metal\s+Restore\s+Problem\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Point\s+in\s+Time\s+Bare\s+Metal\s+Restore\s+Problem\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Point in Time Bare Metal Restore Problem (score: 1): Author: "Adrian Soetanto" <adrian.soetanto AT bentoel.co DOT id>; Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 14:37:01 +0700; Dear all, I have a problem of Point in Time Bare Metal Restore (BMR) using Netbackup 6.5 (both Master Server & Client are using the same version). Suppose I have 3 successful BMR backups of UNIX syst; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-10/msg00101.html (14,801 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Point in Time Bare Metal Restore Problem (score: 1): Author: "WEAVER, Simon $external$" <simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net>; Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 09:08:07 +0100; Adrian I could be wrong here, but BMR goes back to the last "current configuration date and time". So if the "A" backup was a FULL and has the BMR info on this, then it would go back to "A" first. Th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-10/msg00102.html (16,939 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Point in Time Bare Metal Restore Problem (score: 1): Author: "Adrian Soetanto" <adrian.soetanto AT bentoel.co DOT id>; Date: Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:12:41 +0700; Hi Simon, Thanks for your reply. I guess that the scenario you explained is for Incremental Backup, while I'm using Full Backup for all backups. Maybe it's not right then? Let me make it simpler: Sup; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-10/msg00104.html (17,068 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]