Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Password\s+Protection\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Password\s+Protection\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Veritas-bu] Password Protection (score: 1): Author: "Clem Kruger" <clem AT re-thinking-it DOT com>; Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 12:34:51 +0200; What is the specification of this large server? How many CPU's and memory? What HBA's and how many of them do you have. How many network cards are you using and how many are there? Kind Regards, Clem; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00002.html (12,111 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Password Protection (score: 1): Author: Dennis Peacock <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2007 09:50:25 -0700; This was in fact client side software encryption set at the policy level. +-- +-- _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu http:/; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00094.html (11,101 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] Password Protection (score: 1): Author: "Cruice, Daniel $US - Glen Mills$" <dcruice AT deloitte DOT com>; Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:25:33 -0400; Does anyone out there know if NBU 6.5 will allow the ability to Password protect tapes? Dan Cruice This message (including any attachments) contains confidential information intended for a specific i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00413.html (11,723 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] Password Protection (score: 1): Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>; Date: Fri, 21 Sep 2007 09:50:42 -0400 (EDT); Encryption has been included for quite a while now. _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu http://mailman.eng.auburn.edu/mailma; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00415.html (11,558 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] Password Protection (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 08:28:12 -0500; The difference with 6.5 is that encryption is included as part of the base product and does not need to be purchased separately. Search the archives for pros and cons of software encryption vs hardwa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00461.html (12,197 bytes)
6. [Veritas-bu] Password Protection (score: 1): Author: Dennis Peacock <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 15:47:56 -0700; Backup Encryption within Netbackup is a real performance killer!!!! We tested this on a fairly large server. Standard file level backup, using 10 LTO-3 tape drives and average speed was 80MB per seco; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00670.html (11,335 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] Password Protection (score: 1): Author: "Rockey Reed" <rockey_reed AT symantec DOT com>; Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 18:07:30 -0700; Dennis, Was this with MSEO (Media Server Encryption Option) of client side encryption? Thanks, Rockey J. Reed You're not obligated to win. You're obligated to keep trying to do the best you can every; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-09/msg00672.html (12,085 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]