Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Newbie\s+to\s+Netbackup\s+using\s+VTL\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Newbie\s+to\s+Netbackup\s+using\s+VTL\s*$/: 22 ]

Total 22 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: netbackup-forum at backupcentral.com (dy018); Date: Thu, 10 May 2007 23:22:08 -0700; Hi everyone, I'm new using VTL with netbackup. I was hoping anyone here already implemented such a setup in their current environment and hope share your general setup plan? I'm now planing for such; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00237.html (11,871 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: clem at re-thinking-it.com (Clem Kruger); Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:24:51 +0200; Contact me on my private e-mail and we can discuss the issues. Kind Regards, Clem Kruger Senior Consultant Technology Cabangisisa IT Solutions Office: +27 (0)11 795 1581 Mobile: +27 (0)83 326 2260 Fa; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00248.html (13,435 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: pkeating at bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Keating); Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 10:53:32 -0400; For starters, if you have 100 clients, you wouldn't create 100 drives. You don't want all of your backups running at once. But you could create 10 drives, or 20, or however many you want/need. You co; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00251.html (15,070 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: blaine_robison at yahoo.com (Blaine Robison); Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 08:04:41 -0700 (PDT); I understand that VTL able to create multiple tape libraries and tape drives. Yes this is correct. There is a limit depending on the manufacturer. Common practice is to use vault. You can create a sc; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00252.html (13,836 bytes)
5. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: liddles at amgen.com (Liddle, Stuart); Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 12:50:50 -0700; NO....Don't use Vault to duplicate from VTL to physical tape!!! We tried this, and in NB 5.1 MP6, Vault is a HOG!! We were not able to keep the drives spinning fast enough using Vault. The best speed; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00265.html (15,764 bytes)
6. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: Robin.Small at fresno.gov (Robin Small); Date: Fri, 11 May 2007 15:27:47 -0700; Not sure if you've picked your VTL unit yet.. We're using the ADIC (now Quantum) Pathlight VX for our VTL. Mostly, it's sharing out virtual LTO3s to our four NetWare cluster servers (with some nifty; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00268.html (13,499 bytes)
7. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: clem at re-thinking-it.com (Clem Kruger); Date: Sun, 13 May 2007 19:00:03 +0200; Good day to you all, Those of you who are thinking of using VTL's I would urge to re think that technology. There are so many issues, the main being you are still bound by SCSI rules. Another fact is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00272.html (17,217 bytes)
8. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: backupicici at gmail.com (Veritas Netbackup); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 09:48:29 +0530; I have tried answering a few of your questions. Yes a VTL will look exactly like a robotic library. Robots and drives, but in abundance :) 2. In general, media Server do not share a tape media with o; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00273.html (14,886 bytes)
9. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: cpreston at glasshouse.com (Curtis Preston); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 01:58:01 -0400; Looks like it's my week to disagree with you, Stuart. (Sorry. I love ya' man!) saw >going to physical tape using vault was maybe 30MB/sec. Usually we got I've been able to get Vault to go MUCH faster; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00276.html (14,138 bytes)
10. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: cpreston at glasshouse.com (Curtis Preston); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 01:58:06 -0400; 1. Does a Virtual Tape Library have robot arm in the master server GUI? Yes. 2. In general, media Server do not share a tape media with other media server, hence in the VTL contain images from differ; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00277.html (13,204 bytes)
11. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: cpreston at glasshouse.com (Curtis Preston); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 01:58:19 -0400; Good day to you! Can't say I agree with you there. I hate responding in the negative, but your message was so strongly worded against VTLs, I felt I just had to respond. You're bound by SCSI rules a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00278.html (14,789 bytes)
12. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: cpreston at glasshouse.com (Curtis Preston); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 02:07:17 -0400; images find them. But if your Vault is setup right, you just run it again and it figures out what else to dupe and dupes it. _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Ver; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00279.html (11,957 bytes)
13. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: kmeidal at amgen.com (Meidal, Knut); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 10:48:00 -0700; Warning, long ramble follows... I'll take the middle ground. The existence of a VTL appliance is IMO due to the fact that backup utilities (from now on limited to NBU) are not really stellar at using; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00302.html (18,891 bytes)
14. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: ssesar at mitre.org (Steven L. Sesar); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:26:29 -0400; The way that CommVault does it with Gridstor is that each media server shares an index cache (the equivalent of NBU's catalog/databases) via NFS or CIFS. I call it a "poor man's clustered filesystem; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00306.html (14,129 bytes)
15. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: cpreston at glasshouse.com (Curtis Preston); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 14:52:40 -0400; any NBU's index is already centralized at the master (and therefore shared amongst media server), so media servers can take over for other media servers any time. be resiliency! This is where CommVau; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00310.html (13,272 bytes)
16. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: ssesar at mitre.org (Steven L. Sesar); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 15:17:49 -0400; Really? They will automatically failover/load balance? Something new in 6.x? How are the media servers logically grouped? Is this now a function of STU groups? (pssst! I'm the guy who asked you the q; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00312.html (14,723 bytes)
17. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: liddles at amgen.com (Liddle, Stuart); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 13:10:02 -0700; OK....so now I have to disagree with Curtis on his disagreement.... We tried using Vault with both preserving of Multiplexing and doing de-multiplexing on the vault copies. In both cases, we did not; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00314.html (16,229 bytes)
18. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: cpreston at glasshouse.com (Curtis Preston); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:42:47 -0400; If you use a storage unit group (available for a few versions now) or "any available," any available media server can backup any other media server's client, or at least any clients that are configur; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00318.html (15,069 bytes)
19. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: cpreston at glasshouse.com (Curtis Preston); Date: Mon, 14 May 2007 18:56:22 -0400; Nothing speaks like experience. Your experience was that Vault didn't work for you, and I'm glad to see you tried mpx and not. I completely agree about the big files/small files thing. I also know th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00320.html (17,721 bytes)
20. [Veritas-bu] Newbie to Netbackup using VTL (score: 1): Author: clem at re-thinking-it.com (Clem Kruger); Date: Tue, 15 May 2007 10:21:27 +0200; Hi Curtis, but your message was so strongly worded against VTLs, I felt I just had to respond. I have nothing against VTL's or their manufacturers. what you mean here. The VTL follows the SCSI rules; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-05/msg00323.html (17,912 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 20
Page: [1] [2]