Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Netbackup\s+Master\s+server\s+hardware\s+\-\s+Solaris\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Netbackup\s+Master\s+server\s+hardware\s+\-\s+Solaris\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris (score: 1): Author: "Mellor, Adam A." <Adam.Mellor AT woodside.com DOT au>; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 12:12:19 +0800; good morning, I am Interested in asking the community thier opinions for what hardware platform works best for master only netbackup servers. We currently are running our master in a master media con; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00237.html (15,373 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris (score: 1): Author: <judy_hinchcliffe AT administaff DOT com>; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:16:17 -0500; I have had both windows and AIX masters. I like AIX better (could be some favoritism here as I am an AIX admin), I boot the server less often. Had to boot the windows master a little more then I like; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00244.html (19,153 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris (score: 1): Author: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 14:37:56 -0500; Our NBU master used to be on a Sun SPARC V490 running Solaris 9. Very solid but also pretty costly. When we found a better use for the V490 we looked around and finally settled with an HP DL385G2 run; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00247.html (20,072 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris (score: 1): Author: "Clausen, Matt R[EQ]" <Matthew.R.Clausen AT Embarq DOT com>; Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 15:46:50 -0500; There’s a white paper out there when Sun was using a T5220 as a media server streaming to about 6-8 StorageTek 10000 drives. When we refreshed our NetBackup infrastructure in one location, we d; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00252.html (20,087 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris (score: 1): Author: Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com; Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 14:58:15 -0500; T2000's also work well as media and master servers. Rusty Major, MCSE, BCFP, VCS Sr. Storage Engineer SunGard Availability Services 757 N. Eldridge Suite 200, Houston TX 77079 281-584-4693 Keeping Pe; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00266.html (17,154 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Master server hardware - Solaris (score: 1): Author: "Patrick" <netbackup AT whelan-consulting.co DOT uk>; Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:20:42 +0100; Is that Oracle T2000s? J Regards, Patrick Whelan VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for UNIX. VERITAS Certified NetBackup Support Engineer for Windows. netbackup AT whelan-consulting.co DOT; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00267.html (23,153 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] Netbackup Master server hardware - Solaris (score: 1): Author: "Lawrence K. Chen, P.Eng." <lkchen AT ksu DOT edu>; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 09:21:41 -0500; We have a T2000 master server and a T2000 media server. We also have a V240 as a media server, because our LTO1's and the L700 require HVD SCSI...and we weren't able to get a working controller for t; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00283.html (13,973 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]