Author: bwindle AT wlgore DOT com (Bobby R Windle)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:42:18 -0400
I have a question: Is there another way besides deleting or moving the client to another policy, to put one of the clients on hold in a policy with many others? In other words, I have a policy with m
Author: cheryl.king AT intrado DOT com (King, Cheryl)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 09:29:05 -0600
I'm interested in the answer to this question as well. I always delete the client from the policy. I have a question: Is there another way besides deleting or moving the client to another policy, to
Author: dfdwyer AT tecoenergy DOT com (Dennis Dwyer)
Date: Tue, 05 Aug 2003 11:54:37 -0400
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=_F9A7E452.98F9A
Author: fergus.milton AT ntlworld DOT com (Fergus Milton)
Date: Tue, 5 Aug 2003 22:17:30 +0100
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --=_NextPart_000_001D_01C35B9F.5C42B870 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I won't be on 4.5 for a
Fergus What you're describing is no longer possible in 4.5, as the GUI now appends a checksum to that text file, if the checksum doesn't match the next time the class config is loaded, an error will
Author: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com (Donaldson, Mark)
Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2003 09:58:15 -0600
I keep a policy called "holding" that I stuff these clients into so I don't forget about them. Deleting the last reference to a client deletes the client altogether. Keeping it in a dummy policy make