Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NetBackup\s+on\s+Linux\s+\(RH4\)\s+vs\.\s+NetBackup\s+on\s+Solari\s+s\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s (score: 1)
Author: Dominik Pietrzykowski <dominik_pietrzykowski AT toll.com DOT au>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:47:58 +1000
Aleksandr, Symantec develop Netbackup on Solaris and Windows, all the others are a port, atleast that's what I've been told. There's a lot of big customers running Netbackup on Solaris with 1500+ cli
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00064.html (13,760 bytes)

2. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s (score: 1)
Author: Dominik Pietrzykowski <dominik_pietrzykowski AT toll.com DOT au>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 12:21:05 +1000
Edson, You get what you pay for and I compared the SUN V40z (when they came out) to an equivalent IBM (x345 ????, can&#8217;t remember) and it was 35% faster and only a few thousand more. We ran apps
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00067.html (21,644 bytes)

3. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s (score: 1)
Author: "Martin, Jonathan" <JMARTI05 AT intersil DOT com>
Date: Fri, 5 Oct 2007 09:16:51 -0400
We're a big Dell shop here in the US and I've got boxes nearing end of life / on their 5th and 6th year of warranty support and Dell has had no issues getting hardware to me within the support guidel
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00069.html (17,250 bytes)

4. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s (score: 1)
Author: "Edson Noboru Yamada" <enyamada AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 10:34:33 -0300
Edson, You get what you pay for and I compared the SUN V40z (when they came out) to an equivalent IBM (x345 ????, can't remember) and it was 35% faster and only a few thousand more. We ran apps, DBs
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00092.html (21,946 bytes)

5. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s (score: 1)
Author: "Curtis Preston" <cpreston AT glasshouse DOT com>
Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2007 13:18:04 -0400
I believe you meant to say that Solaris X86 isn&#8217;t supported as a media or master server. It is supported as of NBU 6.5, using Solaris x86 10 running on AMD64, which is what the V40Z is. See the
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00095.html (26,788 bytes)

6. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s (score: 1)
Author: "Edson Noboru Yamada" <enyamada AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2007 19:12:37 -0300
Thanks for correcting me, Curtis. Regards On 10/6/07, Curtis Preston <cpreston AT glasshouse DOT com I believe you meant to say that Solaris X86 isn't supported as a media or master server. It is sup
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00097.html (27,794 bytes)

7. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s (score: 1)
Author: Dominik Pietrzykowski <dominik_pietrzykowski AT toll.com DOT au>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 09:47:12 +1000
Hi Jonathan, I don't think they care much about us Aussies !!!! To be honest we're probably a small enterprise market when you compare us to the US. Dom We're a big Dell shop here in the US and I've
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00099.html (17,082 bytes)

8. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup on Linux (RH4) vs. NetBackup on Solari s (score: 1)
Author: Dominik Pietrzykowski <dominik_pietrzykowski AT toll.com DOT au>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 10:34:19 +1000
Hi Edson, services, that is pretty high too morning"). We have a good relationship with Sun here and don&#8217;t find them to be ripping us off. We have Platinum support but only all them in if there
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-10/msg00101.html (24,840 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu