Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NetBackup\s+Disk\s+Staging\s+Performance\s+Questions\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NetBackup\s+Disk\s+Staging\s+Performance\s+Questions\s*$/: 7 ]

Total 7 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Disk Staging Performance Questions (score: 1): Author: ewilts at ewilts.org (Ed Wilts); Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 07:05:47 -0600; We use FATA drives - not much difference between them and SATA really. This appears to be a NetBackup issue and we're working directly with Symantec engineering on our destaging performance issues. W; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00009.html (13,105 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Disk Staging Performance Questions (score: 1): Author: JMARTI05 at intersil.com (Martin, Jonathan (Contractor)); Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 08:46:00 -0500; We're using Dell MD1000s direct attached to 3 media servers w/ 14 SATAII 500GB Disks in a Raid 5 setup. I'm easily able to write to them at 200MB/sec+ and I can drive LTO3s (compressed) to 120MB/sec.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00010.html (17,866 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Disk Staging Performance Questions (score: 1): Author: pkeating at bank-banque-canada.ca (Paul Keating); Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 09:23:55 -0500; The only thing that screams at me from below is the NetApp 3020. Since the 3020 is, AFAIK, a NAS filer (At least the one I have is), are you saying that the 3020 is mounting the LUNs from the the Arr; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00014.html (17,952 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Disk Staging Performance Questions (score: 1): Author: jroyer at digitalmotorworks.com (Joe Royer); Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 14:26:36 -0600 (CST); I use a STK FLX210 (EOL) SATA array for my DSSU, but I'm using NBU 5.1MP4 and LTO2. I have no trouble maxing out LTO2 with a 3+1 RAID-5 on SATA, although the MAX_STAGING_JOBS and STAGING_JOB_KB_LIMIT; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00021.html (14,372 bytes)
5. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Disk Staging Performance Questions (score: 1): Author: jan-ake.ronnblom at skeria.skelleftea.se (Rönnblom Janåke /Teknous); Date: Sun, 04 Mar 2007 16:38:27 +0100; Anyone have anything based on facts on NTFS vs Unix/Linux and fragmentation of filesystems? == Jan?ke R?nnblom IT avdelningen, Teknous, Skellefte? Kommun Assistentgatan 23 931 77 Skelleftea (Sweden); /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00034.html (12,352 bytes)
6. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Disk Staging Performance Questions (score: 1): Author: bernard.verheuen at fortis.com (VERHEUEN Bernard); Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 10:22:51 +0100; Hi, About the orphan images, I've written a script that scans the DSSU and interrogates the catalog. When images from DSSU are not found in the catalog they are orphaned. Read the DSSU and for each u; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-03/msg00037.html (17,404 bytes)
7. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup Disk Staging Performance Questions (score: 1): Author: anthony_segran at symantec.com (Anthony Segran); Date: Wed, 28 Feb 2007 21:34:31 -0700; Hello All I am working with one of my favorite customers and they have raised a few questions on issues faced in their NetBackup v6.0 MP4 environment. You would certainly see various customer configu; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2007-02/msg00529.html (14,373 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 7
Page: [1]