Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NetBackup\s+\&\s+Blat\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NetBackup\s+\&\s+Blat\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] NetBackup & Blat (score: 1): Author: tim burlowski <tim.burlowski AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:47:09 -0600; We have heard from customers that they would like us to remove our requirement that you install a third party tool like blat in order to have NetBackup send mail on Windows. In fact this improvement; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-02/msg00009.html (12,041 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup & Blat (score: 1): Author: "smpt" <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>; Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:01:55 +0200; Hi, I'm using blat, but not nbmail.cmd I have custom scripts that run with "at" or netbackup scheduler and I have put the blat inside them. Netbackup sent one email for every job. And for me this mak; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-02/msg00011.html (13,077 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup & Blat (score: 1): Author: tim burlowski <tim.burlowski AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 07:55:27 -0600; Thats potentially a lot of email. What do you do with that email? Does a human read it? -- tim burlowski _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu maillist - Veritas-bu AT mailman.en; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-02/msg00023.html (13,733 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] NetBackup & Blat (score: 1): Author: "Sweeney, Patrick" <Patrick.Sweeney AT axcelis DOT com>; Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:29:51 -0500; I have several scripts for daily monitoring that either call the installed instance of blat directly or reuse the nbmail.cmd script. 1. A daily status report which details any backups which ended in; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-02/msg00024.html (15,132 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 4
Page: [1]