Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NDMP\s+Tape\s+drives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+NDMP\s+Tape\s+drives\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] NDMP Tape drives (score: 1): Author: "Wilcox, Donald A (GE Global Research)" <wilcox AT ge DOT com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 11:56:35 +0000; I have some new LTO5 drives and 2 of 4 of my netapps won’t show the drive serial numbers. I have checked switch ports, os levels, hba model and firmware. They are all exactly the same. I am con; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2012-01/msg00030.html (11,594 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Tape drives (score: 1): Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <JLightner AT water DOT com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:08:22 +0000; In which library are the drives installed? If these are fibre drives then you must also map them to the server from the tape library as well as zoning them in via the switch. That is to say libraries; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2012-01/msg00031.html (16,872 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP Tape drives (score: 1): Author: "Bahnmiller, Bryan E." <bbahnmiller AT dtcc DOT com>; Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2012 14:10:13 +0000; Donald, Do you have the latest tape configuration files on your NetApp? Run a “storage show tape supported” on the filer and check. I ran a quick check on mine and don’t see any LTO; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2012-01/msg00032.html (13,904 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] NDMP tape drives (score: 1): Author: "Jerry Rioux" <jerryrioux AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:34:46 -0400; We are running NB 5.1 on a Windows master and have 2 drive in an autoloader. One drive is defined as an NDMP drive the other is a normal media drive. Can I make an NDMP storage unit and point to the; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00508.html (11,360 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP tape drives (score: 1): Author: "Ed Wilts" <ewilts AT ewilts DOT org>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 11:44:20 -0500; On 4/29/08, Jerry Rioux <jerryrioux AT gmail DOT com> wrote: We are running NB 5.1 on a Windows master and have 2 drive in an autoloader. One drive is defined as an NDMP drive the other is a normal m; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00515.html (12,335 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP tape drives (score: 1): Author: "Brooks, Jason" <brooksje AT longwood DOT edu>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 13:18:53 -0400; Yes – with 6.x, IIRC, you can share a drive between NDMP and non-NDMP. I think it started with 6.0, but I’m not sure. It’s there in 6.5 for certain. From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mail; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00517.html (14,230 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP tape drives (score: 1): Author: "Meidal, Knut" <kmeidal AT amgen DOT com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 10:29:30 -0700; This is a situation where a VTL would be quite useful. You could create some virtual drives that are assigned as NDMP drives and dedicated to a filer, and also have a suitable number of non-NDMP driv; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00519.html (15,220 bytes)
8. Re: [Veritas-bu] NDMP tape drives (score: 1): Author: "Ulate, Mauricio (Tape Storage)" <mau.ulate AT hp DOT com>; Date: Tue, 29 Apr 2008 17:36:24 +0000; Could you guys please stop sending me those emails. I want to get out of the distribution list.. Thanks From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.en; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-04/msg00520.html (15,281 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]