Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+LTO\s+tape\s+label\s+\/\s+sequence\?\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+LTO\s+tape\s+label\s+\/\s+sequence\?\s*$/: 8 ]

Total 8 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] LTO tape label / sequence? (score: 1): Author: J.Keating AT tachi-s DOT com; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 16:11:50 -0500; Hello, The question of "should we be paying particular attention of tape labels" question reared it's ugly head for me once again and I can't remember the answer. Am I correct to believe that NBU won; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00117.html (12,163 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tape label / sequence? (score: 1): Author: A Darren Dunham <ddunham AT taos DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 21:28:31 +0000; By 'label', do you mean the barcode on the outside of the tape? If so, when you put such a tape in the robot, it will assume it is the original (written to) tape with the same barcode. However, if it; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00119.html (12,614 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tape label / sequence? (score: 1): Author: <judy_hinchcliffe AT administaff DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2010 15:31:27 -0600; NB will not allow duplicated id’s So yes, if you try to inject a tape that has the same barcode as one you already have IN THE LIBRARY it will not allow it.. But the answer to your question is; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00120.html (14,683 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tape label / sequence? (score: 1): Author: "William Brown" <william.d.brown AT gsk DOT com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 14:05:07 +0100; I was quite surprised to find that NetBckup is not just looking at the tape label, but also what I think is the cartridge serial number with LTO. I guess that comes from the LTO-CM. This is 6.5.4 Thi; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00127.html (17,671 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tape label / sequence? (score: 1): Author: "Lightner, Jeff" <jlightner AT water DOT com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 08:36:10 -0500; Here we always order new tapes with barcodes that start in sequence with the end of the last set. Duplicating barcodes is not a good idea. From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mail; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00128.html (22,185 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tape label / sequence? (score: 1): Author: "William Brown" <william.d.brown AT gsk DOT com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:15:52 +0100; Well I thought that but see a bit above: \\.\Tape1, drive serial number HU10606CNF, expected serial number HU10606CNF That’s the drive serial number. William D L Brown From: Preston, Douglas [m; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00130.html (25,219 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tape label / sequence? (score: 1): Author: Len Boyle <Len.Boyle AT sas DOT com>; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 13:30:22 -0500; William, We have seen this extra label checking on a unix (solaris) master also. With our master at 6.5.3 it is not quite so pretty. I believe that there are several known methods for the serial numb; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00132.html (21,425 bytes)
8. Re: [Veritas-bu] LTO tape label / sequence? (score: 1): Author: J.Keating AT tachi-s DOT com; Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2010 16:51:34 -0500; Thanks to all for the info. I think we will be ordering several hundred at a time and paying attention to the labels. Regards, John Keating Information Technology Tachi-S Engineering U.S.A. Inc. Len; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00133.html (19,842 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 8
Page: [1]