Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+L100\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+L100\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] L100 (score: 1): Author: atif76 AT gmail DOT com (Atif Munir); Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 13:04:25 +0500; we are going to replace our 3*LTO2 drives with 6*LTO3 drives in L100 library. How much faster our backups will be? thanks in advance. atif; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2005-11/msg00651.html (10,153 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] L100 (score: 1): Author: simon.weaver AT astrium.eads DOT net (WEAVER, Simon); Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:22:42 -0500; Really could not say if that one piece of hardware is going to help! You could have the fastest server (client) on earth, fastest tape drive, but if there is a bottleneck in between the 2, you are no; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2005-11/msg00654.html (11,581 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] L100 (score: 1): Author: pkeating AT bank-banque-canada DOT ca (Paul Keating); Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 08:30:25 -0500; Anywhere from slower to Much faster. If you had a bucnh of clients multiplexed to 3*LTO2 drives and were barely streaming the drives, now you're taking the same and spreading across 6*LTO3 drives, yo; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2005-11/msg00655.html (11,695 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]