Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Is\s+it\s+wrong\.\.\.\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Is\s+it\s+wrong\.\.\.\s*$/: 6 ]

Total 6 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Is it wrong... (score: 1): Author: David A. Chapa" <david AT xbpadm-commands DOT com (David A. Chapa); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 09:36:47 -0700 (PDT); I have a client with the following configuration: L700 - in a SAN with NetBackup 3.4 and SS0 Upon reviewing their site, I noticed several Storage Units configured for each media server. They each con; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00070.html (11,926 bytes)
2. [Veritas-bu] Is it wrong... (score: 1): Author: petes AT convergentdata DOT net (Peter Smith); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:54:13 -0600; I doesn't a first glance look like a problem. But it is logically wrong. There is no need to reference the robot twice. This would only make sense if you were limiting the number of drives logically; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00073.html (13,190 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] Is it wrong... (score: 1): Author: sdvorak AT veritas DOT com (Steve Dvorak); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:23:38 -0700; This would never be a 'problem' per se, it could just queue jobs. Are these storage units configured to use the same drives in the same robot, or different ones? If different ones, is this because th; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00075.html (12,668 bytes)
4. [Veritas-bu] Is it wrong... (score: 1): Author: David A. Chapa" <david AT xbpadm-commands DOT com (David A. Chapa); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:30:50 -0700 (PDT); No, same robot, same drive type, everything the same. It just doesn't seem right to me, even if it does work. From an administrative point of view, perhaps I can understand why they did it, but in "B; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00076.html (14,220 bytes)
5. [Veritas-bu] Is it wrong... (score: 1): Author: sdvorak AT veritas DOT com (Steve Dvorak); Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2001 10:34:03 -0700; If you can change it to a best practices type layout, this would be better, and less confusing to the consultant that has to work on it ;-) Steve No, same robot, same drive type, everything the same.; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00078.html (14,567 bytes)
6. [Veritas-bu] Is it wrong... (score: 1): Author: scott.kendall AT abbott DOT com (scott.kendall AT abbott DOT com); Date: Wed, 6 Jun 2001 12:47:39 -0500; If all of the below is true... 1.) Storage Units are NOT configured as on-demand 2.) number of drives configured on each Storage Unit matches the physical number of drives 3.) the classes are using a; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2001-06/msg00103.html (18,003 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 6
Page: [1]