Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Inline\s+Tape\s+Copy\s+vs\s+Storage\s+Unit\s+Groups\s+$and\s+otherITC\s+wierdness$\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Inline\s+Tape\s+Copy\s+vs\s+Storage\s+Unit\s+Groups\s+$and\s+otherITC\s+wierdness$\s*$/: 2 ]

Total 2 documents matching your query.

1. Re: [Veritas-bu] Inline Tape Copy vs Storage Unit Groups (and otherITC wierdness) (score: 1): Author: "Donaldson, Mark" <Mark.Donaldson AT Staples DOT com>; Date: Fri, 24 Apr 2009 16:08:08 -0600; Our use for storage unit groups is for failover in the possiblity that a media server goes down. The only backups we have that go direct to a standard storage unit is the few servers reachable throug; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00288.html (15,675 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Inline Tape Copy vs Storage Unit Groups (and otherITC wierdness) (score: 1): Author: Girish Jorapurkar <girishsj AT yahoo DOT com>; Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2009 15:33:04 -0700 (PDT); Agree, "Slowest device performance" rates is not specific to STU groups. Also, I guess, there is no effect on STU selection (in STU group) if the selection criteria is "failover". Can you please shar; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-04/msg00291.html (16,207 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 2
Page: [1]