Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Experiences\s+with\s+Netapp\s+backups\s*$/: 4 ]

Total 4 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Experiences with Netapp backups (score: 1)
Author: Michael Graff Andersen <mian71 AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:44:26 +0100
Hello After our Netapp demo, I got curious what are the experiences of people that have Netapp in production for backup ? Regards Michael _______________________________________________ Veritas-bu ma
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-02/msg00329.html (11,101 bytes)

2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Experiences with Netapp backups (score: 1)
Author: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz AT lucidpixels DOT com>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 2009 09:42:05 -0500 (EST)
You need NDMP license to backup the data on it, it works well, never had any major issues with it, there was a 1TB file limitation per device/path, not sure if that exists anymore. Justin. __________
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-02/msg00332.html (11,467 bytes)

3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Experiences with Netapp backups (score: 1)
Author: Wayne T Smith <wts AT maine DOT edu>
Date: Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:03:26 -0500
We have a few NetApp filers with FC, iSCSI and NFS storage. We don't do NDMP, but that's because of license costs and ignorance, I suppose. Our backups have been host-based with traditional NetBackup
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-02/msg00378.html (12,713 bytes)

4. Re: [Veritas-bu] Experiences with Netapp backups (score: 1)
Author: Dean <dean.deano AT gmail DOT com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:07:52 +1100
We're using NDMP to FC tape for weekly fulls, and NDMP to a disk staging STU on the master server for daily differentials. It's very reliable. The only issue I have is the performance. For the FULLs,
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2009-02/msg00389.html (13,913 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu