Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+EMC\s+Data\s+Domain\s+OST\s+Vs\s+VTL\s+with\s+NetBackup\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+EMC\s+Data\s+Domain\s+OST\s+Vs\s+VTL\s+with\s+NetBackup\s*$/: 18 ]

Total 18 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: sandesh <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 07:37:44 -0700; We are in the early stages of implementing EMC Data Domain dedupe appliance and use Symantec NetBackup. I've a couple of questions about it for the experts. Plan is to have a DD appliance in 1 locati; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00080.html (12,951 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: ckstehman AT pepco DOT com; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 11:17:55 -0400; Hello Sandesh We have 4 DataDomain systems two at each of our main sites. We replicate between both sites. We are using the OST option with Storage Lifecycle Policies. we are currently running Netbac; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00081.html (16,500 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:28:44 -0500; The OST plugin will help you with the offsite copy to your duplicate DD appliance because the use of optimized duplication, available when using OST and NBU, reduces the bandwidth used to duplicate i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00082.html (14,788 bytes)
4. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:30:10 -0500; Apologies, SLP is a storage lifecycle policy, not process. I was typing faster than I was thinking ! Mark Glazerman Desk: 314-889-8282 Cell: 618-520-3401 please don't print this e-mail unless you rea; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00083.html (16,022 bytes)
5. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 10:37:35 -0500; I just checked with my DD SE and you do not need to have your DD appliance setup as a VTL to be able to duplicate to tape using an SLP. My original post was correct, backup destination will be DD#1,; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00084.html (14,698 bytes)
6. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: William Brown <william.d.brown AT gsk DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 18:10:19 +0200; The restriction we found when we looked into this in 2008 was that the DD only supported one 'LSU'. That meant that a single DD appliance could only be used by a single NetBackup domain. We wanted to; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00085.html (16,083 bytes)
7. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: <Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 13:47:54 -0500; I wouldn't recommend a VTL with NBU at all as NBU works extremely well using Disk Pools/Disk Staging Storage Units. Making your disk look like a bunch of tape drives just adds more management and com; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00087.html (17,888 bytes)
8. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>; Date: Thu, 14 Apr 2011 15:13:54 -0500; Just a quick response to one of the earlier posts regarding LSUs and multi-domain NBU environments. OST and Data Domain does support deployment into NBU environments where there is more than one Net; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00090.html (24,775 bytes)
9. [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: sandesh <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Mon, 18 Apr 2011 06:54:56 -0700; Thanks to Carl, Mark, William and Rusty for their responses. I'm in favor of OST over VTL too. However, its always good to know more. Surprising to see that noone is using Data Domain devices in VTL; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00110.html (13,354 bytes)
10. [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: rhugga <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:39:10 -0700; You want to use OST without a doubt.. With optimized deduped replication you end up pushing almost nothing across the wire.. With VTL its a full rehydration on the source end before it gets replicate; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00120.html (14,275 bytes)
11. [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: rhugga <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2011 13:41:13 -0700; I also wanted to add that pretty soon you will be able to do synthetic backups at your DR site which is a huge bonus.. You can now assemble full backups from data that already exists on the replicate; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00121.html (13,414 bytes)
12. [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: sandesh <nbu-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 13:10:09 -0700; Thanks rhugga I also have a quick question to all experts on dedup ratio that you see on database backup, for e.g. SQL, DB2 & Oracle. What is the usual ratio you see with database backups using nativ; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00137.html (13,775 bytes)
13. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: <Rusty.Major AT sungard DOT com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 15:20:52 -0500; You will get little to no dedupe if your DBA or DB agent performs any compression or encryption on the db backup before it gets onto the DD. Always note, what you will get and what someone else will; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00138.html (17,061 bytes)
14. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "Kendall, Scott" <scott.kendall AT twcable DOT com>; Date: Fri, 22 Apr 2011 16:30:00 -0400; Whether doing duplication within NetBackup or using OST with something like Data Domain, this is a good read if using Oracle RMAN... http://www.symantec.com/business/support/index?page=content&id=DOC; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00139.html (15,269 bytes)
15. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>; Date: Sat, 23 Apr 2011 23:25:09 -0500; Sandesh, I took the following numbers off of our dd670 this evening. Oracle (10g) is being backed up by RMAN using the oracle client for NBU 7.0. We backup all filesystems (Data, db, arch and redo) i; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00141.html (14,750 bytes)
16. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "smpt" <smpt1 AT peppas DOT gr>; Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2011 10:36:19 +0300; Are you using fileperset=1 at rman script? Netbackup by default is using fileperset=5 which is not good for deduplication --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-bounces AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00142.html (15,495 bytes)
17. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "Mark Glazerman" <Mark.Glazerman AT spartech DOT com>; Date: 24 Apr 2011 07:57:44 -0500; We are aware of filesperset=1 being better but we opted for faster backups over compression when we started using DD. We are planning to implement incremental merge backups for oracle shortly which r; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00143.html (14,470 bytes)
18. Re: [Veritas-bu] EMC Data Domain OST Vs VTL with NetBackup (score: 1): Author: "Kendall, Scott" <scott.kendall AT twcable DOT com>; Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 17:30:01 -0400; If you have Data Domain and want to get more granular information on compression, in addition to running ost lsu show compression or filesys show compression from the Data Domain itself, you can also; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2011-04/msg00153.html (26,063 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 18
Page: [1]