Search String: Display: Description: Sort:

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Duplication\s+time\s+\!\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Duplication time ! (score: 1)
Author: karunanidhis AT hotmail DOT com (Karunanidhi Subramanian)
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 10:20:12 -0700
Hi Folks ! I am using bpvault extension (3.4)to setup an offsite media storage system. While testing the duplication, I see the duplication speed being 30 GB/Hour where as our backup speed is 35 GB/h
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2002-06/msg00322.html (11,383 bytes)

2. [Veritas-bu] Duplication time ! (score: 1)
Author: Mark.Donaldson AT experianems DOT com (Donaldson, Mark)
Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2002 12:37:08 -0600
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01C2162D.FC7412C0 Content-Type: text/plain On
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2002-06/msg00325.html (16,791 bytes)

3. [Veritas-bu] Duplication time ! (score: 1)
Author: Joost Mulders <mail AT j-mulders.demon DOT nl> (Joost Mulders)
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2002 00:22:21 +0200 (MEST)
Well, I know one reason for duplication to be slower as backup: even if sourceand destionatio storage unit are locally (scsi) attached, the data travels over the loopback network interface. Yes, it
/usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2002-06/msg00331.html (11,796 bytes)


This search system is powered by Namazu