Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Boring\s+Subject\?\s+\-\s+Adding\s+LTO\s+IV\s+FC\s+drives\s+into\s+an\s+SL8500\s+with\s+existing\s+LTO\s+II\s+drives\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+Boring\s+Subject\?\s+\-\s+Adding\s+LTO\s+IV\s+FC\s+drives\s+into\s+an\s+SL8500\s+with\s+existing\s+LTO\s+II\s+drives\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] Boring Subject? - Adding LTO IV FC drives into an SL8500 with existing LTO II drives (score: 1): Author: "Scott Jacobson" <SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com>; Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2010 22:19:10 -0700; Ok, I'll try again. Looking through some archives there are various discussions, but not that I can see with an SL8500/ACSLS environment. So, if anyone with experience sharing LTO II and LTO IV drive; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00139.html (13,060 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] Boring Subject? - Adding LTO IV FC drives into an SL8500 with existing LTO II drives (score: 1): Author: Travis Kelley <rhatguy AT gmail DOT com>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 07:19:16 -0500; If you don't care about the LTO4s being able to read the LTO 2 tapes just change the media type to something different on the 4s (HCART2 or HCART3). Netbackup automatically will not load the "wrong"; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00140.html (13,625 bytes)
3. Re: [Veritas-bu] Boring Subject? - Adding LTO IV FC drives into an SL8500 with existing LTO II drives (score: 1): Author: Carl Elkins <ce1 AT sanger.ac DOT uk>; Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2010 14:12:56 +0000; This will happen by default - you have to fiddle painfully to try to get NetBackup to use non-native tapes in drives. It just works (we had, until recently, LTO-2/3/4 in our SL8500). Sorry, can't ans; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2010-01/msg00141.html (14,604 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]