Author: jpiszcz AT servervault DOT com (Piszcz, Justin)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:24:58 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_=_NextPart_001_01C55635.327AE110 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable All, =20 I was curious if any
Multiple streams over multiple network interfaces. There is *NO* way you can sustain 100 megabytes per second. That's all the interface is physically capable of and you'll be lucky to get half that.
Author: pkeating AT bank-banque-canada DOT ca (Paul Keating)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 10:44:39 -0400
Particulrly since in many cases the client is connected to the master/media server over several switches/routers that may only have a gig of bandwidth between them, and have much more traffic than a
Author: jpiszcz AT servervault DOT com (Piszcz, Justin)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 12:23:28 -0400
Fair enough, but does anyone have a working-solution for this? I asked in-part to see if anyone else was backing up this much data per day. --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.
I backup around 1,5 TB a day. Servers are almost any kind of Windows servers you can find, like SQL, Exchange, SPS, file and so on. The servers are on an ExtremeNetworks Black Diamond 6808 and at the
Author: Mark.Donaldson AT cexp DOT com (Mark.Donaldson AT cexp DOT com)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 11:02:51 -0600
I backup an average of 15 TB a week across multiple servers. I used to manage a 20TB Oracle backup from a single cluster. For this kind of volume, I suggested that you should consider directly attach
Author: jpiszcz AT servervault DOT com (Piszcz, Justin)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 13:09:46 -0400
Thank you for all the replies! This is very useful information. --Original Message-- From: veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu [mailto:veritas-bu-admin AT mailman.eng.auburn DOT edu] On Be
Author: alfonso.correas AT arrakis DOT es (Alfonso Correas Serrat)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 20:06:38 +0200
--Apple-Mail-2-88645464 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed El 11/05/2005, a las 16:24, Piszcz, Justin escribi=F3: There are many
Author: David_Cornely AT intuit DOT com (Cornely, David)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 14:50:14 -0700
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --_=_NextPart_001_01C55673.69BFA122 Content-Type: text/plain Co
Author: jpiszcz AT servervault DOT com (Piszcz, Justin)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 18:33:03 -0400
This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --_=_NextPart_001_01C55679.651557BA Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Also, if this is true: =20 Is
Author: Charles Ballowe <cballowe AT gmail DOT com> (Charles Ballowe)
Date: Wed, 11 May 2005 21:16:19 -0500
Definitely better to keep your tape drives spinning. I've reduced thenumber of drives each of my media servers is allowed to use forbackups because I can stream drives at 50-60M/sec, but with a singl
Author: Sto RageŠ <netbacker AT gmail DOT com> (Sto RageŠ )
Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 18:55:34 -0700
<*please don't flame me for bringing up a non Veritas solution*>We were in the same situation last year. We took a different approachthough. This year we began deploying NetApp's Open System Snapvaul
Author: jkennedy AT qualcomm DOT com (Kennedy, Jeffrey)
Date: Fri, 13 May 2005 16:00:32 -0700
The limit of 1tb is actually not correct anymore. It's not an NDMP stream limit either. We were worried about this as well but our operations have confirmed the limit is 2tb *on a single tape*, not a
Author: michael AT michaelbarrow DOT name (Michael L. Barrow)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 06:59:32 -0700
That doesn't seem to be accurate based on this alert: <http://seer.support.veritas.com/docs/273806.htm> So, which is the truth? -- Michael L. Barrow <michael AT michaelbarrow DOT name>
Author: jg AT datasec DOT ch (DATASEC Software GmbH Javier González)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 16:43:47 +0200
It's not possible a " limit is 2tb *on a single tape* " because no tape (at the moment) is able to handle such capacity Max SAIT is 1.2 TB x band Otherwise, we have customers with 3.2 TB files and we
Author: jkennedy AT qualcomm DOT com (Kennedy, Jeffrey)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 08:45:45 -0700
The particular problem (according to Veritas) is their being able to track 2tb worth of data in a single location. Think disk stu's. Whether or not that is true is open to the floor. Many times we ge
Author: SJACOBSO AT novell DOT com (Scott Jacobson)
Date: Fri, 20 May 2005 11:04:40 -0600
This is a MIME message. If you are reading this text, you may want to consider changing to a mail reader or gateway that understands how to properly handle MIME multipart messages. --=__Part0427C5B8.