Mail Archive Search: <+subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+BESR\s+vs\s+NB\s+BMR\s*$/>

Results:

References: [ +subject:/^(?:^\s*(re|sv|fwd|fw)[\[\]\d]*[:>-]+\s*)*\[Veritas\-bu\]\s+BESR\s+vs\s+NB\s+BMR\s*$/: 3 ]

Total 3 documents matching your query.

1. [Veritas-bu] BESR vs NB BMR (score: 1): Author: X_S <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Wed, 03 Dec 2008 10:09:23 -0500; we use bmr for netbackup but i would like to know what people think of backup exec system recovery. does anyone have experience with both? +-- +-- _______________________________________________ Veri; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-12/msg00060.html (10,859 bytes)
2. Re: [Veritas-bu] BESR vs NB BMR (score: 1): Author: Brendan Clover <Brendan.Clover AT unisa.edu DOT au>; Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2008 08:41:03 +1030; Hi, We use BESR for backing up the c:\ drive of our Windows servers. It is very good, backups are easy, restores work and management through the management console is very easy. The only real problem; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-12/msg00071.html (13,008 bytes)
3. [Veritas-bu] BESR vs NB BMR (score: 1): Author: X_S <netbackup-forum AT backupcentral DOT com>; Date: Thu, 04 Dec 2008 08:51:50 -0500; Brendan, thanks for your input. we might be using BESR for less than half the number of servers you have. so i hope the disk space isn't an issue for us. neither do we have the requirement Right now; /usr/local/webapp/mharc-adsm.org/html/Veritas-bu/2008-12/msg00083.html (11,099 bytes)

Current List: 1 - 3
Page: [1]